2020
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v14n1p29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFL Female Students’ Perceptions towards Cheating in Distance Learning Programmes

Abstract: Distance education is becoming more demanding at universities all around the world in general and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in particular, than ever before. This study aimed at highlighting the students’ perceptions of cheating on distance learning at King Abdulaziz University (KAU). The study will further explore the ways they use to cheat, causes for cheating, and some solutions to minimize cheating. This study was conducted at the end of the second semester in 2019. Data was collected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature includes some works which determined several ways learners already used to cheat in online courses. For example, learners were more likely to obtain answers from others during an online test (Saleh & Meccawy, 2021;Watson & Sottile, 2010). Other found ways of online cheating include students' dishonest collaboration and sharing assignments with one another (Hearn Moore, Head, & Griffin, 2017;McGee, 2013;Sendag, Duran, & Fraser, 2012) as well as copying the information from the Internet or other learners' answers (Diego, 2017;Golden & Kohlbeck, 2020;Hosny & Fatima, 2014;Saleh & Meccawy, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Literature includes some works which determined several ways learners already used to cheat in online courses. For example, learners were more likely to obtain answers from others during an online test (Saleh & Meccawy, 2021;Watson & Sottile, 2010). Other found ways of online cheating include students' dishonest collaboration and sharing assignments with one another (Hearn Moore, Head, & Griffin, 2017;McGee, 2013;Sendag, Duran, & Fraser, 2012) as well as copying the information from the Internet or other learners' answers (Diego, 2017;Golden & Kohlbeck, 2020;Hosny & Fatima, 2014;Saleh & Meccawy, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, lack of responsibility, laziness, lack of respect for academic rules, and showing no interest or being unwilling to study as well as low self-esteem are the most important internal reasons (Diego, 2017). In addition, peer influence (Diego, 2017), getting passing grades, not necessarily knowledge (Saleh & Meccawy, 2021), getting passing grades to please their parents (Diego, 2017;Finchilescu & Cooper, 2018;Hosny & Fatima, 2014;Jian, H., Li & Wang, 2020), the exam difficulty, not being able to prepare for the exam (Diego, 2017;Hosny & Fatima, 2014), non-existence of punishment or consequences when being caught cheating (Diego, 2017;Hosny & Fatima, 2014;Jones, 2011;Peled, Eshet, Barczyk, & Grinautski, 2019;Yang, Huang, & Chen, 2013), being absent from lessons (Hosny & Fatima, 2014;Saleh & Meccawy, 2021), lack of study time, willingness to help friends (Hosny & Fatima, 2014), and technical problems occurring during an online exam (Saleh & Meccawy, 2021) are among the external causes. Diego (2017) reported the reasons that students had for their cheating.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations