“…It was quite efficient and consistent with the estimation of the ANPP for the high Andean wetlands. The model presents an acceptable correlation, similar to that found by MOREAU et al [2003], BAEZA et al [2011], andIRISARRI et al [2012], with R 2 equal to 0.58, 0.67, and 0.64 respectively. These results show great representativeness, despite circumstances and diversity of factors that could affect them, such as the presence of clouds, sampling error, the percentage of the pixel that covers the bofedal, temperature, precipitation, terrain slope, the productivity The temporal variability of the estimated ANPP for the wetlands is due to a seasonal dynamic sustained over time with a non-significant positive trend.…”