2011
DOI: 10.31285/agro.15.592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eficiencia en el uso de la radiación y productividad primaria en recursos forrajeros del este de Uruguay

Abstract: La productividad primaria neta aérea (PPNA) es uno de los atributos ecosistémicos más importantes, siendo el principal control de la carga ganadera en pastizales. Tradicionalmente se ha estimado a partir de cortes periódicos de biomasa. La información espectral permite estimar la PPNA a bajo costo y en tiempo real sobre áreas extensas. Para ello se requiere la calibración de modelos que relacionen información espectral con la PPNA estimada mediante cortes de biomasa a campo, cuantificando un factor clave en es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was quite efficient and consistent with the estimation of the ANPP for the high Andean wetlands. The model presents an acceptable correlation, similar to that found by MOREAU et al [2003], BAEZA et al [2011], andIRISARRI et al [2012], with R 2 equal to 0.58, 0.67, and 0.64 respectively. These results show great representativeness, despite circumstances and diversity of factors that could affect them, such as the presence of clouds, sampling error, the percentage of the pixel that covers the bofedal, temperature, precipitation, terrain slope, the productivity The temporal variability of the estimated ANPP for the wetlands is due to a seasonal dynamic sustained over time with a non-significant positive trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was quite efficient and consistent with the estimation of the ANPP for the high Andean wetlands. The model presents an acceptable correlation, similar to that found by MOREAU et al [2003], BAEZA et al [2011], andIRISARRI et al [2012], with R 2 equal to 0.58, 0.67, and 0.64 respectively. These results show great representativeness, despite circumstances and diversity of factors that could affect them, such as the presence of clouds, sampling error, the percentage of the pixel that covers the bofedal, temperature, precipitation, terrain slope, the productivity The temporal variability of the estimated ANPP for the wetlands is due to a seasonal dynamic sustained over time with a non-significant positive trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The PAR is derived from daily available radiation meteorological data sources; fPAR is found through models used by GRIGERA et al [2007] which is based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The RUE is obtained through a linear model between absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), a product of PAR and fPAR, and continuous field monitoring data for a given period [BAEZA et al 2011;OYARZABAL et al 2010;VERÓN et al 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the rapid increase of CGR after 45 das might be attributed to fertilization, nevertheless, this hypothesis was not investigated here. The NAR indicates the amount of biomass accumulated in terms of leaf area and time (Díaz-López et al 2013). Also, the NAR is indirectly related to light penetration in the canopy (Tajul et al 2013).…”
Section: Dry Matter Accumulation and Maize Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased dry matter (DM) can be attributed to greater plant height (PH) and a larger leaf area (LA). Additionally, a greater number of leaves and a larger leaf area result in increased radiation interception, leading to higher plant dry matter (Díaz-López et al 2013). Plants with higher dry matter content tend to have a higher grain yield, and the increased grain yield was explained by the higher harvest index (Table 2).…”
Section: Correlation Between Vegetative Characteristics Dry Matter An...mentioning
confidence: 99%