Eficacia del sistema Armeo®Spring en la fase crónica del ictus. Estudio en hemiparesias leves-moderadas

Colomer, Carolina; Baldoví, A.; Torromé, S.; Navarro, María Dolores; Moliner, B.; Ferri, J.; Noé, Enrique

doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2012.04.017

Cited by 55 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The UEFM and the Motoricity Index (MI) were used as primary outcome measures. Both the UEFM (mean score of 45.7 at study onset with an improvement to 50 post training, and 52.7 at a 4-month follow up) and the MI (mean score of 69 at study onset with improvement to 72.6 on completion of training and 73.7 on follow up) demonstrated significant improvements after training, and these benefits were sustained at a four-month follow up assessment (Colomer et al, 2013).…”

Section: Armeopowermentioning

confidence: 90%

Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: A review and clinical perspective

Bishop

Stein

2013

NRE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Many survivors of stroke remain with residual disabilities, even years later. Advances in technology have led to the development of a variety of robotic devices for use in rehabilitation. The integration of robotics in the delivery of neurorehabilitation is promising, but still not widely used in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to discuss the general design of three typical upper limb robotic devices, and examine the practical considerations for their use in a clinical environment. METHODS: Each device is described, the available clinical literature is reviewed and a clinical perspective is given on the usefulness of these robotic devices in rehabilitation of this population. RESULTS: Current literature supports the use of robotics in the clinical environment. However, claims that robotic therapy is more effective than traditional treatment is not substantially supported. The majority of clinical trials reported are small, and lack the use of a control group for comparison treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of robotics in stroke rehabilitation is still a relatively new treatment platform, and still evolving. As technological advances are made, there is much potential for growth in this field.

show abstract

Section: Armeopowermentioning

confidence: 90%

Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: A review and clinical perspective

Bishop

Stein

2013

NRE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Puede resultar óptimo en reproductibilidad, tamaño, uso amigable y función ergonómica; y se recomienda su uso para fases de poca movilidad 8 . Sin embargo, hasta ahora su utilidad se ha restringido práctica-mente a pacientes con algún daño neurológico, utilizando un promedio de 36 sesiones y encontrando mejoría en escalas funcionales 9,10 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Rehabilitación robótica e isocinética en paciente con acromioplastia: a propósito de un caso

Magaña

Domínguez

2016

Rev Col Med Fis Reh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rehabilitación robótica e isocinética en paciente con acromioplastia: a propósito de un caso Rev Col Med Fis Rehab 2016; 26(1): 109-113 Rehabilitación robótica e isocinética en paciente con acromioplastia: a propósito de un caso REPORTE DE CASO Robotic and isokinetic rehabilitation in a patient with acromioplasty: clinical casePavel Loeza-Magaña, Lizbeth Adriana Zúñiga-Domínguez RESUMENMujer de 61 años; inicia su padecimiento 5 años atrás con dolor de hombro derecho, diagnosticada como pinzamiento subacromial y desgarro del músculo supraespinoso. Es intervenida el 01 de diciembre de 2014, realizándose con acromioplastia con osteotomía y plastia de supraespinoso. Inicia rehabilitación a los 29 días con medios físicos y movilizaciones, así como terapia ocupacional. Al mes se inicia rehabilitación robótica con Armeo Power que se mantiene por 55 sesiones, además de mantener la terapia física. Al llevar 45 sesiones con brazo robótico se añade al tratamiento fortalecimiento isocinético por 12 sesiones. Al término continúa con programa domiciliario. Se valora a 8 meses de la cirugía encontrándose funcional, independiente y con movilidad completa, por lo que se egresa por mejoría.Palabras clave: rehabilitación, fuerza, dinamometría. ABSTRACTWoman of 61 years of age; the disease started 5 years ago with pain in the right shlouder, the diagnosis is subacromial impingement and supraespinatus muscle tears. The surgery was december 01, 2014 with acromioplasty, ostheotomy and supraespinatus plasty. The rehabilitation starts at 29 days with physical medicine, motion exercise and occupational therapy. At last of one month the robotics rehabilitation starts with Armeo power for 55 sessions, while maintaining physical therapy. When 45 sessions was completed with robotic arm is added to isokinetic strengthening treatment for 12 sessions. At last she continues with home based program. She is valued at 8 months after surgery meeting functional, independent and fully mobile so he was discharged for improvement.

show abstract

“…Because of its format, therapists report that it is efficient to use and helpful in planning interventions [7]. It has been used as a primary outcome measure in studies of standard neurorehabilitation approaches [8], electrical stimulation [9, 10], virtual reality [11], circuit training [12], constraint-therapy [13], and type of rehabilitation facility [14, 15]. Additionally, it has been used in a variety of descriptive studies related to stroke rehabilitation [16–18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies report the total score for all 8 items [8, 14], total score for only the mobility, balance and walking items [15], or scores for single items, such as walking [16, 18, 27] or upper arm [8, 9]. Often, the score for the upper limb (UL) subscale [11–13, 17, 28, 29] is reported. This score, which can range from 0 to 18, is based on performance in the upper arm, hand movements, and advanced hand activities items.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rasch Analysis of a New Hierarchical Scoring System for Evaluating Hand Function on the Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke

Sabari

Woodbury

Velozo

2014

Stroke Research and Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. (1) To develop two independent measurement scales for use as items assessing hand movements and hand activities within the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), an existing instrument used for clinical assessment of motor performance in stroke survivors; (2) To examine the psychometric properties of these new measurement scales. Design. Scale development, followed by a multicenter observational study. Setting. Inpatient and outpatient occupational therapy programs in eight hospital and rehabilitation facilities in the United States and Canada. Participants. Patients (N = 332) receiving stroke rehabilitation following left (52%) or right (48%) cerebrovascular accident; mean age 64.2 years (sd 15); median 1 month since stroke onset. Intervention. Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures. Data were tested for unidimensionality and reliability, and behavioral criteria were ordered according to difficulty level with Rasch analysis. Results. The new scales assessing hand movements and hand activities met Rasch expectations of unidimensionality and reliability. Conclusion. Following a multistep process of test development, analysis, and refinement, we have redesigned the two scales that comprise the hand function items on the MAS. The hand movement scale contains an empirically validated 10-behavior hierarchy and the hand activities item contains an empirically validated 8-behavior hierarchy.

show abstract

Eficacia del sistema Armeo®Spring en la fase crónica del ictus. Estudio en hemiparesias leves-moderadas

Abstract: Armeo® Spring is an effective tool for rehabilitating the affected arm in patients with hemiparesis secondary to ictus, even in the chronic stage.

Cited by 55 publications

References 44 publications

Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: A review and clinical perspective

Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: A review and clinical perspective

Rehabilitación robótica e isocinética en paciente con acromioplastia: a propósito de un caso

Rasch Analysis of a New Hierarchical Scoring System for Evaluating Hand Function on the Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About