Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative Analysis

Hicks, Nathan M.; Douglas, Kerrie A.

doi:10.18260/1-2--30366

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, although it has been noted by personal experiences in different settings that SBG is likely a more consistent grading system (Selbach‐Allen et al, 2020), more rigorous grader training with the SBG system was instituted to improve the reliability and quality of feedback on assignments (Hicks, 2020; Hicks & Douglas, 2018). One indicator of improvement is the average number of characters in the graders' written feedback.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reflection types and students' viewing of feedback in a first‐year engineering course using standards‐based grading

Diefes‐Dux

Castro

2022

J of Engineering Edu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Feedback is one of the most powerful and essential tools for learning and assessment, particularly when it provides the information necessary to close an existing gap between actual and reference levels of performance. The literature on feedback has primarily focused on addressing strategies for providing effective feedback rather than aspects of students' readiness to engage with feedback. Purpose/Hypothesis This study investigated whether reflection, as a routine pedagogical intervention grounded in self‐regulated learning theory, promotes the frequency with which students view feedback. Design/Method A quasi‐experimental design was employed to examine the relationship between the use of four different reflection types, as well as no reflection, and students' feedback viewing behaviors in a first‐year engineering course that used standards‐based grading. Clickstream data were gathered through the learning management system to count the number of times students viewed feedback. The number of feedback views was compared by reflection type using descriptive statistics and a generalized linear model; weekly feedback viewing patterns were examined using time‐descriptive graphs and the time‐series cluster analysis. Results Findings suggest reflection has the potential to increase the frequency of feedback views. Reflection not only had a positive and significant effect on the number of times students viewed feedback but also resulted in less variability between course sections and instructors when structured reflections made explicit references to feedback. Conclusions Students need feedback to learn effectively, but many do not view feedback without formal prompting. The authors recommend instructors consistently administer reflections that include explicit pointers to feedback throughout the semester.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Grading was done primarily by the undergraduate teaching assistants and supervised by the TA. In 2017, online grader training was launched to improve the reliability of the grading (Hicks, 2020; Hicks & Douglas, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%