2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effluent profile of commercially used low-phosphorus fish feeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention efficiency of P by fish has been reported to be about 20% (Sugiura et al 2006), a value that is very close to our estimate. Unlike C and N, a major proportion of feed P was released as particles because of the low P digestibility in feed.…”
Section: Release Rates Of C N and P Wastessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The retention efficiency of P by fish has been reported to be about 20% (Sugiura et al 2006), a value that is very close to our estimate. Unlike C and N, a major proportion of feed P was released as particles because of the low P digestibility in feed.…”
Section: Release Rates Of C N and P Wastessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…According to Chen et al (2003), approximately 15% of the C and N in faeces were leached after a few minutes in water, and there was no further significant leaching thereafter. Moreover, approximately 15% of faecal P becomes soluble in minutes or hours (Sugiura et al 2006). Feed loss is relatively low from modern salmon farming where feeding is normally camera assisted …”
Section: Mass Balance Of C N and P In Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolved organic C, N and P (DOC, DON and DOP, respectively) are resuspended from faeces and feed particles able for bacteria and for phytoplankton over a longer time scale (Palenik & Morel 1990, Fan et al 2003, Stoecker & Gustafson 2003. One of the main challenges facing aquaculture today is sustaining a continued increase in fish production while minimizing the impact on the environment (Sugiura et al 2006, Navarrete-Mier et al 2010. The salmon aquaculture industry has taken a number of steps to reduce nutrient release from salmon farming facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global aquaculture is the fastest growing food-producing sector, with nearly half of the world's seafood supply now sourced from aquaculture (FAO 2012). A main challenge facing this industry is sustaining a continued increase in fish production while minimizing the impact on the environment (Sugiura et al 2006, 1994, Phillips et al 1991) and the rapid expansion of caged fish culture has raised a general concern about the release of solid and dissolved waste products to the environment (Troell & Norberg 1998, Perez et al 2002, Cheshuk et al 2003, Whitmarsh et al 2006, Valdemarsen et al 2012, Taranger et al 2015. Conspicuous environmental ef fects can stem from the increased organic matter loading on the seafloor, and consequential changes in benthic habitat and communities (Strain & Hargrave 2005, Kutti et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%