2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4799236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiently finding the minimum free energy path from steepest descent path

Abstract: Minimum Free Energy Path (MFEP) is very important in computational biology and chemistry. The barrier in the path is related to the reaction rate, and the start-to-end difference gives the relative stability between reactant and product. All these information is significant to experiment and practical application. But finding MFEP is not an easy job. Lots of degrees of freedom make the computation very complicated and time consuming. In this paper, we use the Steepest Descent Path (SDP) to accelerate the sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the free energy function in Eq 6 has two terms, and so does its derivative. However, as we tested before [26, 27], the second term is much smaller than the first term. So in this work, only the first term, i.e., the ensemble average of the Lagrange multiplier < λ >, is used in the calculation of the free energy gradient in Eqs 2 and 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that the free energy function in Eq 6 has two terms, and so does its derivative. However, as we tested before [26, 27], the second term is much smaller than the first term. So in this work, only the first term, i.e., the ensemble average of the Lagrange multiplier < λ >, is used in the calculation of the free energy gradient in Eqs 2 and 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Due to the determinant of the metric tensor in Eq 6, analytic derivation of the second term is very complicated. For simple molecules like ALA dipeptide in the low dimensional collective variable space, it can be approximately calculated by the numerical central difference method [27]. However, for large molecules with lots of constraints, like 10-ALA in this work, even the numerical method becomes impractical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of efficiency, the mentioned WZ method is slower than popular optimization methods like gradient-based steepest descent [7], Newton-Raphson [12], Fletcher-Powell [17], or Broyden-FletcherGoldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) [59]. However, it finds a global minimum of the potential energy with higher probability and has a lower tendency to converge on and get stuck in the nearest local minimum, which is not necessarily the global minimum of the energy function [66].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%