2022
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2021.3138496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Yield Estimation of Multiband Patch Antennas Using NLPLS-Based PCE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performing only source stirring or platform stirring leads to a biased estimation of the radiation efficiency. [28] Efficient yield estimation of multiband patch antennas using NLPLS-based PCE.…”
Section: Gain Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing only source stirring or platform stirring leads to a biased estimation of the radiation efficiency. [28] Efficient yield estimation of multiband patch antennas using NLPLS-based PCE.…”
Section: Gain Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klink et al showed the use of PCE for yield analysis of a 4-parameter quad-mode antenna using the reflection coefficient as the performance metric. For a detailed explanation of this method, the reader is referred to [3][4]. Another widely used metamodeling method is referred to as Kriging (Gaussian process modelling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PC-Kriging is less computationally intensive compared to standalone PCE and Kriging techniques, large numbers of samples (model evaluations) are required as the dimensionality of the problem increases. In [4], PC-Kriging required more samples for yield convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Improving the computational efficiency of statistical analysis can be achieved using simplistic yet inaccurate methods (e.g., worst-case analysis [19][20][21]) or surrogate-assisted techniques [22,23], where repetitive EM simulations are replaced by an evaluation of a fast replacement model, usually prepared beforehand. Popular modeling methods include polynomial approximation [24], neural networks (NNs) [25,26], or polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Despite their advantages, surrogate-based methods are affected by the curse of dimensionality, resulting in excessive costs of model rendition for more complex systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%