2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient visual attention based framework for extracting key frames from videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjective evaluation methods were used in [16,[60][61][62][63]. In [60], subjective assessment was used to grade the single key-frame representations as 'good' , 'bad' or 'neutral' for each video shot and also give appreciations on the number of key-frames with possible grades being 'good' , 'too many' and 'too few' in the case of multiple key-frames per shot.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subjective evaluation methods were used in [16,[60][61][62][63]. In [60], subjective assessment was used to grade the single key-frame representations as 'good' , 'bad' or 'neutral' for each video shot and also give appreciations on the number of key-frames with possible grades being 'good' , 'too many' and 'too few' in the case of multiple key-frames per shot.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [61,63], the quality of the key-frame summary is evaluated by asking users to give a mark between 0 to 100 for three criteria, 'informativeness' , 'enjoyability' and 'rank' after watching the original sequences and the respective key-frames summaries. Ejaz et al [62] used subjective evaluations to compare the proposed method with four prominent key-frame extraction methods: open video project (OV) [45], Delaunay triangulation (DT) [64], STIll and MOving Video Storyboard (STIMO) [65] and Video SUMMarisation (VSUMM) [24]. In this case, the evaluation is based on mean opinion scores (MOS) and viewers are asked to rate the quality of the key-frame summary on scale of 0 (minimum value) to 5 (maximum value) after watching the original sequences and the respective summaries generated by all the methods.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger M i c is, the more attention it gets. To model the attention prior, linear fusion schemes are used for the fusion of various attention scores to generate an aggregated attention score [61]. The general form of linear fusion schemes is as follows:…”
Section: Attention Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as of now, one of the most primary video sharing web sites like YouTube reported that more than 1 billion unique users visit YouTube each month and 72 hours of video are uploaded every minute [13]. The evegrowing number of videos has motivated researchers to design efficient and effective video management schemes in order to provide a better overall multimedia experience to the consumer [1]. Summarization is mainly used to provide a condensed version of a full-length video through the identification of most important content within it [2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarization is mainly used to provide a condensed version of a full-length video through the identification of most important content within it [2,4]. Video skimming and key frame extraction are the two basic methods for summarizing videos [1][2][3][4]. A video of much shorter duration than the actual one is produced in the later case whereas the former deals with extracting some salient frames from the videos which preserves the overall content of a video with minimum data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%