2019 19th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icar46387.2019.8981625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Traversability Mapping for Service Robots Using a Point-cloud Fast Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters used in the experimentation are presented in Table 2. For these experiments, we used a traversable map of the environment that accounts for the height of the robot, as built by existing libraries [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parameters used in the experimentation are presented in Table 2. For these experiments, we used a traversable map of the environment that accounts for the height of the robot, as built by existing libraries [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, 3D sensor information can also be exploited to build 2D traversable maps, which are easier to compute and store, still considering important aspects like the height of the robot. For example, MONO SLAM [21] uses RGB-D cameras for this type of 2.5D maps, and our prior work, PFF [22], exploits low-end point-clouds obtained by RGB-D cameras and 3D LiDARs for the same purpose. In general, a large variety of approaches based on SLAM have been proposed to build geometric maps in 2D and 3D environments.…”
Section: Object Detection and Semantic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, 3D sensors can be used with 2D SLAM methods for the creation of 2D maps. For example, the package [ 69 ], which selects the points at a certain angle to convert the 3D information into 2D; the work presented in [ 70 ] also selects the relevant points of the 3D point-cloud and takes into account the height of the robot to build traversable maps, also called 2.5 maps that improve robot 2D navigation. Figure 6 shows a comparison between a pure 2D SLAM approach and a traversable map.…”
Section: Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were obtained from a pre-recorded dataset [ 63 ] and default parameter values. The sensor is located at 60 cm of height, the resolution is of 0.4° with an horizontal FoV of 360°, the sensor frequency is 10 Hz and the robot height is 1 m: ( a ) resulting map given by Gmapping with a 2D LiDAR; ( b ) traversable (2.5D) map given by Gmapping using a 3D LiDAR and the Point-Cloud Fast Filter [ 70 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%