2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient thermal lens nanoparticle detection in a flow-focusing microfluidic device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found the optimal measurement conditions and proved being able to measure the full TLM signal from 20 consecutive sample flowing volumes (of 0.6 μL) in a minute (thus 20 times/minute). In a similar work, Yamaoka et al [71] have presented a flowfocusing microchip, which together with a TLM allowed the detection of ~ 85% of the polystyrene 500-nm particles injected individually into the chip. The microchip designed by them is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Advances In Tlm and Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the optimal measurement conditions and proved being able to measure the full TLM signal from 20 consecutive sample flowing volumes (of 0.6 μL) in a minute (thus 20 times/minute). In a similar work, Yamaoka et al [71] have presented a flowfocusing microchip, which together with a TLM allowed the detection of ~ 85% of the polystyrene 500-nm particles injected individually into the chip. The microchip designed by them is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Advances In Tlm and Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 In contrast, TLM finds its niche in detecting nanoparticles, especially for metallic nanoparticles. [60][61][62][63] Imaging static biological samples have been performed using TLM. [64][65][66] TLM may have the potential to detect biological nanoparticles under flow conditions, as the detection principle is not directly linked to the size or refraction index of the analyte.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many other optical‐based detection techniques used in microfluidic devices including chemiluminescence , TL detection , surface plasma resonance detection , and surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection . Although these techniques are sensitive, they are not suitable to be used in the microfluidic flow cytometry due to their detection mechanism.…”
Section: Detection In Microfluidic Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%