2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.013
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient synthesis of robust models for stochastic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its introduction in Daws' seminal work [20] in 2004, parametric model checking has underpinned the development of a vast array of methods for the modelling and analysis of software and other computer-based systems. These include methods for comparing alternative system designs [30], [31], sensitivity analysis [26], parameter synthesis [8], [9], [22], [32], probabilistic model repair [3], [16], dynamic reconfiguration of self-adaptive systems [14], [21], [24], [25], and synthesis of confidence intervals for the QoS properties of software systems [10], [11]. These methods address very different problems, and yet most researchers who developed them mention the same limitation of parametric model checking: its computationally intensive nature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction in Daws' seminal work [20] in 2004, parametric model checking has underpinned the development of a vast array of methods for the modelling and analysis of software and other computer-based systems. These include methods for comparing alternative system designs [30], [31], sensitivity analysis [26], parameter synthesis [8], [9], [22], [32], probabilistic model repair [3], [16], dynamic reconfiguration of self-adaptive systems [14], [21], [24], [25], and synthesis of confidence intervals for the QoS properties of software systems [10], [11]. These methods address very different problems, and yet most researchers who developed them mention the same limitation of parametric model checking: its computationally intensive nature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, these techniques and tools would start from a set of SCPS requirements, and would present developers with alternative systems designs that satisfy the requirements and are Pareto-optimal with respect to multiple optimisation criteria such as cost, utility and environmental impact. Such solutions have been proposed recently for the development of software systems (e.g., [24], [25]), and can also handle uncertainty in the operational profile of the system under development [26], [27]. However, these solutions cannot yet handle some of the new types of requirements encountered in SCPS.…”
Section: Oc2) Ensuring the Accuracy Of Stochastic Models Of Scps-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extension is presented in Section 4.2, implemented by our new OMNI tool described in Section 5, and shown to reduce verification times by 54-74% (compared to the preliminary OMNI version) in Section 6.5. This is a particularly significant improvement because the same QoS property is often verified many times, to identify suitable values for the parameters of the modelled system (e.g., see the case studies from [32]- [36]). Additionally, we considerably extended and improved the validation of OMNI by evaluating it for the following two systems: 1) A service-based system that we implemented using six real-world web services -two commercial web services provided by Thales Group, three free Bing web services provided by Microsoft, and a free WebserviceX.Net web service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%