2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient strong Unified Formulation for stress analysis of non-prismatic beam structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝐹 𝜏 is the function that captures the cross-sectional deformation and can be expanded to any order 𝜏 for the enrichment of the beam's kinematical description. The cross-sectional function 𝐹 𝜏 adopted in this study is the so-called Serendipity Lagrange expansion (SLE) function that describes the cross-sectional behaviour of the beam accurately and efficiently without the need for re-meshing or loss of numerical stability (for example, see [21][22][23][24]). The stresses (𝝈 = [ 𝜎 𝑥𝑥 𝜎 𝑦𝑦 𝜎 𝑧𝑧 𝜏 𝑦𝑧 𝜏 𝑥𝑧 𝜏 𝑥𝑦] 𝑇 ) and strains (𝜺 = [ 𝜀 𝑥𝑥 𝜀 𝑦𝑦 𝜀 𝑧𝑧 𝛾 𝑦𝑧 𝛾 𝑥𝑧 𝛾 𝑥𝑦] 𝑇 ) relationship is governed by…”
Section: Unified Formulation Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝐹 𝜏 is the function that captures the cross-sectional deformation and can be expanded to any order 𝜏 for the enrichment of the beam's kinematical description. The cross-sectional function 𝐹 𝜏 adopted in this study is the so-called Serendipity Lagrange expansion (SLE) function that describes the cross-sectional behaviour of the beam accurately and efficiently without the need for re-meshing or loss of numerical stability (for example, see [21][22][23][24]). The stresses (𝝈 = [ 𝜎 𝑥𝑥 𝜎 𝑦𝑦 𝜎 𝑧𝑧 𝜏 𝑦𝑧 𝜏 𝑥𝑧 𝜏 𝑥𝑦] 𝑇 ) and strains (𝜺 = [ 𝜀 𝑥𝑥 𝜀 𝑦𝑦 𝜀 𝑧𝑧 𝛾 𝑦𝑧 𝛾 𝑥𝑧 𝛾 𝑥𝑦] 𝑇 ) relationship is governed by…”
Section: Unified Formulation Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to many studies, UF-based models have proved effective for accurate prediction of static, buckling, dynamic and free vibration, and postbuckling responses [16][17][18][19]. As a further development to achieve spectral convergence, the theory of UF has been explored within the context of strong form systems combined with high-order numerical methods like the differential quadrature method (DQM) and radial basis function to realise efficient predictions of linear static [20][21][22][23], dynamic [20], buckling [20] and large deflection [24][25][26] responses of constant stiffness and variable stiffness composite structures. In another development, UF-based strong form systems combined with the recently proposed inverse differential quadrature method (iDQM) [27][28] have shown promise of spectral convergence for linear static analysis of composite beams [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the accuracy of the calculation of stress was more while applying inverse DQM. Ojo et al 35 investigated a 3D stress analysis of VSCL beams undergoing large deflections using a strong unified formulation. It was shown that VSCL beams with the same structural configuration exhibited different behaviour under different loading conditions due to the tailored structural properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the deformation performance, the lattice materials can be divided into stretchingdominated and bending-dominated structures, and the stretch-dominated structures exhibit superior stiffness and strength than the bending-dominated ones. [4] Until now, a lot of lattice structure topologies have been found such as pyramidal lattice, [5][6][7] kagome lattice structure, [8] octet lattice material, [9] tetrahedral lattice, [10] corrugated structure, [11] prismatic structure, [12] and hourglass lattice. [13] Previous investigations on the mechanical behavior of various lattice materials are mostly focused on predicting the macroscopic stiffness and strength experimentally, numerically and theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%