1971
DOI: 10.1115/1.3449809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Solution Processes for Finite Element Analysis of Transient Heat Conduction

Abstract: Systematic procedures are presented for reducing the order of a matrix differential equation governing transient heat conduction in solids. Two principal aspects of this development are a condensation of the set of gridpoint temperature degrees of freedom using steady-state relations and the introduction of generalized (modal) temperature degrees of freedom to achieve a further reduction. These processes are illustrated in an elementary one-dimensional transient heat conduction problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mode superposition methods were originally proposed for transient heat diffusion problems [Biot, 1957;Gallagher and Mallet, 1971;Shih and Skladany, 1983], structural dynamics [Clough and Penzien, 1975], and the diffusion-convection equation [Nickell et al, 1979], and make use of a reduced transformation matrix which contains a number of the leftmost eigenvectors of a generalized eigenproblem with the same size as the finite element grid. Several techniques exist for finding the eigenpairs of sparse matrices [e.g., Parlett, 1980;Bathe, 1982;Hughes, 1987] and computer routines are also available [Bathe and Wilson, Paper number 92WR02331.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mode superposition methods were originally proposed for transient heat diffusion problems [Biot, 1957;Gallagher and Mallet, 1971;Shih and Skladany, 1983], structural dynamics [Clough and Penzien, 1975], and the diffusion-convection equation [Nickell et al, 1979], and make use of a reduced transformation matrix which contains a number of the leftmost eigenvectors of a generalized eigenproblem with the same size as the finite element grid. Several techniques exist for finding the eigenpairs of sparse matrices [e.g., Parlett, 1980;Bathe, 1982;Hughes, 1987] and computer routines are also available [Bathe and Wilson, Paper number 92WR02331.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the appearance of the K~~, ~1 3 , ~2 3 , elements of the conductivity tensor, equation (5) has a non-canonical form.6.12 Hence as has been pointed out by Padovan for conduction problems in anisotropic thin walled shells of revolution,6 the traditional usage of Fourier series fails to yield a solution to equations (947). Furthermore, any attempts to reduce equations ( 3 4 7 ) to one of the canonical forms, renders the boundary value problem analytically intractable.…”
Section: Complex Series Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the area of conductive heat transfer, the finite difference method is still a widely used method. However, the finite element method has also been used to solve steady state [17,18] and transient heat conduction problems [19,20] and it seems to gain popularity. Enery and Carson [21] have compared the FDM and FEM and concluded that the two methods are comparable for some constant-property steady state solutions but the FDM is better for most other cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%