2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b02325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Separation of Ethanol–Methanol and Ethanol–Water Mixtures Using ZIF-8 Supported on a Hierarchical Porous Mixed-Oxide Substrate

Abstract: This work reports a new approach for the synthesis of a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) composite. It employs the direct growth of the crystalline ZIF-8 on a mixed-metal oxide support TiO2–SiO2 (TSO), which mimics the porous structure of Populus nigra. Using the natural leaf as a template, the TSO support was prepared using a sol–gel method. The growth of the ZIF-8 layer on the TSO support was carried out by the seeds and second growth method. This method facilitates the homogeneous dispersion of ZIF-8 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Selectivities calculated with the IAST method using equimolar water–alcohol mixtures have been reported for both MOFs and MOF-based composites. Thus, DMOF ⊃ PNIPAM- 3 in this study has a higher methanol–ethanol selectivity than ZIF-8@TSO (up to 3.8), 50 ZIF-8 (up to 4.5), 50 TetZB (up to ∼1) 13 and [Cu 2 (tpt) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 ](BF 4 ) 2 (up to 11). 51 It also has a higher water–ethanol selectivity as compared with ZIF-8@TSO (up to 1.8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…49 Selectivities calculated with the IAST method using equimolar water–alcohol mixtures have been reported for both MOFs and MOF-based composites. Thus, DMOF ⊃ PNIPAM- 3 in this study has a higher methanol–ethanol selectivity than ZIF-8@TSO (up to 3.8), 50 ZIF-8 (up to 4.5), 50 TetZB (up to ∼1) 13 and [Cu 2 (tpt) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 ](BF 4 ) 2 (up to 11). 51 It also has a higher water–ethanol selectivity as compared with ZIF-8@TSO (up to 1.8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…51 It also has a higher water–ethanol selectivity as compared with ZIF-8@TSO (up to 1.8). 50 The water–ethanol selectivity is lower as compared with ZIF-8 and TetZB as a result of the high hydrophobicity of these frameworks. [Cu 2 (tpt) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 ](BF 4 ) 2 has a unique molecular length-selective effect which favors selective water adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For water treatment, the addition of silica can improve the dispersion of MOFs in composite materials, which is extremely beneficial for the adsorption of pollutants in water and has great potential in the prevention and control of water pollution [147]. Han et al synthesized a series of SiO 2 @Al–MOF(MIL-68) composites with different silica contents, which showed ultrafast aniline adsorption and high recyclability [78].…”
Section: Application Of Mof/silica Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) dominated the field of porous molecule-based materials due to their outstanding sorption characteristics 1,2 including the capture of small molecules (e.g. H2, CO2, CH4), [3][4][5][6][7] water, 8,9 alcohols [10][11][12][13] or compounds as large as aromatics 14,15 or proteins. 16,17 Some of the recent advancements in this field cover exceptional water harvesting applications [18][19][20][21][22] and the construction of adsorption-driven heat pumps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%