1993
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80569-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient screening method for determining base/neutral and acidic semi-volatile organic priority pollutants in sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasonic extraction was compared with Soxhlet extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Marvin et al, 1992).The yield of organic material from sediment samples using ultrasonication with two solvents was 2.53 ± 0.10% whereas the Soxhlet method yielded 2.41 ± 0.14% of the initial sample weight. A screening method capable of recovering base/neutral and acidic organic priority pollutants involved solvent extraction with sonication, solidphase extract clean-up, and quantitative analysis by gas chromatography-ion-trap mass spectrometry (Davis et al, 1993b). The spatial variation of organic pollutants in adjacently collected sediments was found to be greater than anticipated and does not appear to be a result of analytical imprecision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ultrasonic extraction was compared with Soxhlet extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Marvin et al, 1992).The yield of organic material from sediment samples using ultrasonication with two solvents was 2.53 ± 0.10% whereas the Soxhlet method yielded 2.41 ± 0.14% of the initial sample weight. A screening method capable of recovering base/neutral and acidic organic priority pollutants involved solvent extraction with sonication, solidphase extract clean-up, and quantitative analysis by gas chromatography-ion-trap mass spectrometry (Davis et al, 1993b). The spatial variation of organic pollutants in adjacently collected sediments was found to be greater than anticipated and does not appear to be a result of analytical imprecision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%