1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8191(99)00018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient schemes for nearest neighbor load balancing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, N } and a measure x i for every node i ∈ V . The average consensus problem consists in computing the average x A = N −1 i x i in an iterative distributed way, exchanging information among nodes exclusively along the available edges in G. This problem appears in a number of different contexts since the early 80's (decentralized computation [1], load balancing [2], [3], [4]) and, recently, has attracted much attention for possible applications to sensor networks (data fusion problems [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], clock syncronization [10]) and to coordinated control for mobile autonomous agents [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Other places where consensus algorithms have been studied in general are [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] Several algorithms for average consensus can be found in the literature: they differentiate on the basis of the amount of communication and computation they use, on their scalability with respect to the number of nodes, on their adaptability to time-varying graphs, and, finally, they can be deterministic or random.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, N } and a measure x i for every node i ∈ V . The average consensus problem consists in computing the average x A = N −1 i x i in an iterative distributed way, exchanging information among nodes exclusively along the available edges in G. This problem appears in a number of different contexts since the early 80's (decentralized computation [1], load balancing [2], [3], [4]) and, recently, has attracted much attention for possible applications to sensor networks (data fusion problems [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], clock syncronization [10]) and to coordinated control for mobile autonomous agents [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Other places where consensus algorithms have been studied in general are [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] Several algorithms for average consensus can be found in the literature: they differentiate on the basis of the amount of communication and computation they use, on their scalability with respect to the number of nodes, on their adaptability to time-varying graphs, and, finally, they can be deterministic or random.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of papers study the same algorithm: every node runs a first order linear dynamical system to update its estimation and the systems are coupled through the available communication edges. Different schemes (higher order, with memory) however have shown up in the literature, see [4], [3], [22]. The type of problem typically faces in the literature are: necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence, speed of convergence, optimization issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the load transferred over an edge (i, j) in step t does not only depend on the load difference of i and j, but also on the amount of load transferred over the edge in step t − 1. Diekmann, Frommer, and Monien [4] extend the idea of [13] and propose a general framework to analyze the convergence behavior of a wide range of diffusion type methods.…”
Section: Continuous Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion scheme is a simple and well-known scheme sending data to neighboring processes [19,20,21,22]. Another scheme, proposed in [11], is also based on sending tasks to neighbors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%