2015
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2014.2354243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Road Scene Understanding for Intelligent Vehicles Using Compositional Hierarchical Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some gradient based algorithms can be commonly found in the literature, e.g., Sobel edge detector with symmetrical local threshold [93], adaptive thresholding [91], and gradient-enhancing conversion [94]. However, these algorithms are sensitive to noise and can result in a large number of outliers from clutter and shadows.…”
Section: Lane Line Marking Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some gradient based algorithms can be commonly found in the literature, e.g., Sobel edge detector with symmetrical local threshold [93], adaptive thresholding [91], and gradient-enhancing conversion [94]. However, these algorithms are sensitive to noise and can result in a large number of outliers from clutter and shadows.…”
Section: Lane Line Marking Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), the position of the receiver is calculated by using satellite networks through triangulation, utilizing the time at which the satellite signal arrives at the ground-surface receiver and the position information of other satellites. However, owing to various error factors, a positioning error of approximately 7 m occurs [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. In addition, differential GNSS uses the ground master station to address satellite clock, ion/ionospheric, and orbit errors; the positioning error is approximately 2 m in this case, and obtaining an accurate measurement is still difficult [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the characteristics of commonly used positioning sensors, the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) involves a satellite network to calculate the position of a receiver through triangulation by using the time of satellite signal arrival and the position of other satellites. However, it retrieves a measurement error of approximately 7 m due to various factors [1]- [11], rendering it inaccurate for autonomous vehicles. The differential GNSS uses a ground master station to handle satellite clock error, ion/ionospheric error, and orbit error, reducing the measurement error to approximately 2 m [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Wi-Fi has a varying positioning accuracy depending on the installation interval and number of surrounding signal sources (i.e., access points). In the combined inertial navigation system-global positioning system (GPS), sensor bias and noise accumulate over time and are reflected in the measurements, thus sharply decreasing the positioning accuracy and reliability [1]- [11]. Although GPS is widely used for vehicle positioning to track an estimated vehicle position through satellite by transmitting navigation signals, it cannot operate when vehicles are within tunnels and other GPS-shaded areas [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%