2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2007.4394061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient RF Front-End Non-Linear Multi Antenna Coupling Cancellation Techniques

Abstract: One of the recent trends in mobile communication industry is the use of multiple antennas in transmitter and at the receiver in order to gain diversity and achieve high bit rates. At the same time, as the mobile terminals are getting smaller, the number of electronic elements squeezed inside of them increases. Inside this hostile environment the coupling, which can considerably alter the overall system performance, is bound to emerge.To combat the multi antenna RF front-end coupling a DSP software module, posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranks of polynomials, controlled with (N 1 , N 2 ), are determined as a trade off between the acceptable system performance and the required computational power. In [2], the approximation with 20 coefficients for the coupling cancellation fitting surface is proven to be accurate enough.…”
Section: Mathematical Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranks of polynomials, controlled with (N 1 , N 2 ), are determined as a trade off between the acceptable system performance and the required computational power. In [2], the approximation with 20 coefficients for the coupling cancellation fitting surface is proven to be accurate enough.…”
Section: Mathematical Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, even very complex surface with 20 coecients can guarantee excellent decoupling performance in every strong coupling environment, and it would not be logical to expect much simpler surface to cover the whole coupling distortion area with the same precision. This conclusion is also reached in [Ara07a] where SA approach is implemented with dierent surface forms. The corresponding coupling distortions in this article use dierent coupling strength measurements taking into account only numerical coecient ratios, hence from the numerical point of view, coupling of amplitudes [−20, −30, −40]dB in [Ara07a] is equal to approximately [−10, −9, −7]dB coupling strength calculated in this thesis.…”
Section: Decoupling Degrees Of Freedommentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This conclusion is also reached in [Ara07a] where SA approach is implemented with dierent surface forms. The corresponding coupling distortions in this article use dierent coupling strength measurements taking into account only numerical coecient ratios, hence from the numerical point of view, coupling of amplitudes [−20, −30, −40]dB in [Ara07a] is equal to approximately [−10, −9, −7]dB coupling strength calculated in this thesis.…”
Section: Decoupling Degrees Of Freedommentioning
confidence: 55%