Insights and Innovations in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation 2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315641645-341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient response recovery procedures for detailed design of jacket foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure is validated in numerous publications such as (7) and (8). In particular, it is illustrated that a force-controlled dynamic recovery-run yields highly accurate results as long as the superelement accurately represents the spectral properties of the underlying foundation model and thereby its interaction with the superstructure.…”
Section: Integrated Load Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The procedure is validated in numerous publications such as (7) and (8). In particular, it is illustrated that a force-controlled dynamic recovery-run yields highly accurate results as long as the superelement accurately represents the spectral properties of the underlying foundation model and thereby its interaction with the superstructure.…”
Section: Integrated Load Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, providing that a proper reduction method is used, the error is negligible as confirmed e.g. by Nielsen et al [4]. The second violation is introduced if the foundation designer performs structural changes to the jacket subsequent to the aero-elastic calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first violation of the assumption (reduced foundation model) is fairly well investigated by scientific community as well as the industry [2][3][4]9]. However, hardly any publications exist on the inconsistency of the interface forces and its influence on the foundation design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, the foundation is typically represented via a superelement, which is an approximation of its dynamic representation. However, as long as properly spectrally/spatially converged superelements are used, the difference is negligible when a dynamic force-controlled recovery run is performed, as illustrated in [11] and [12], for instance.…”
Section: Fe Models Of Details For Stiffness Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure has been validated in numerous publications, e.g. [11] and [12], yet a brief theoretical argumentation of the consistency is summarized here. In a typical FE representation of the integrated model, the foundation and tower base share a common node at the interface elevation, hence the interface reactions are exchanged as internal (section) forces and do not appear explicitly.…”
Section: Fe Models Of Details For Stiffness Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%