Abstract:We present a thorough derivation of the mathematical foundations of the representation of the molecular linear electronic density-density response function in terms of a computationally highly efficient moment expansion. Our new representation avoids the necessities of computing and storing numerous eigenfunctions of the response kernel by means of a considerable dimensionality reduction about from 10 3 to 10 1 . As the scheme is applicable to any compact, self-adjoint, and positive definite linear operator, w… Show more
“…In this section, we recall the specific notation for the expression of linear operators that we recently introduced. [50] The derivation closely follows the previous version, but differs in the final expression because the basis functions are now allowed to be non-orthogonal for the image as well as the domain of the linear operator.…”
Section: Representation Of Linear Operators Within Non-orthogonal Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently generalized the moment expansion to any compact, self-adjoint, and positive-definite linear operatorT : [50] Assuming a finite (orthonormal) basis {| P 1 i, | P 2 i, …, | P N i} for a subspace of the domain ofT, we showed recently that there is a specific basis set {| ξ 1 i, | ξ 2 i, …, | ξ N i} for the (finite) image ofT which fulfills a partial orthogonality condition with respect to the domain basis:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Reduced Eigensystem Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper, we demonstrated that the density response of a molecule due to the perturbing potential of a neighboring molecule can be described within a few moment expanded states. [50] In this article, we reuse the design of the experiment in order to compare the convergence of the density response with respect to different numbers of employed moment expanded and reduced eigenstates: We choose the perturbative effect of one water molecule on an adjacent one as an elementary example. For simplicity, we use the Hartree potential using the partial charges of one of the most common force field water models (TIP3P) as perturbation.…”
Section: Density Response Of a H 2 O Dimermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29,30,[47][48][49][50] In particular, we generalized these theorems to arbitrary linear, self-adjoint, positive-definite, and compact operators. [50] Within this article, we derived the reduced eigensystem representation as a completion of our development effort toward an efficient representation combined with an efficient determination of the static linear density-density response function. Due to its truncated eigensystem like shape, the enormous reduction of the dimensionality becomes obvious in comparison to the regular eigensystem representation.…”
Section: Summary: On the Different Flavors Of The Density-density Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] In order to tackle this problem, we developed a more efficient, iterative algorithm (referred to as direct moment expansion), which needs a single DFPT calculation per moment expanded state. [49,50] F I G U R E 1 Principal illustration of the response density of the water molecule (right) due to a perturbing water molecule (left). The potential originated from the left water molecule can be expanded at the responding (right) water molecule within a few basis functions…”
The linear density-density response function represents a formulation of the generalized density response of a molecular (or extended) system to arbitrary perturbing potentials. We have recently established an approach for reducing the dimension of the (in principle infinite) eigenspace representation (the moment expansion) and generalized it to arbitrary self-adjoint, positive-definite, and compact linear operators. Here, we present a modified representation-the reduced eigensystem representation-which allows to define a trivial criterion for the convergence of the approximation to the density response. By means of this novel eigensystem-like structure, the remarkable reduction of the dimensionality becomes apparent for the calculation of the density-density response function.
“…In this section, we recall the specific notation for the expression of linear operators that we recently introduced. [50] The derivation closely follows the previous version, but differs in the final expression because the basis functions are now allowed to be non-orthogonal for the image as well as the domain of the linear operator.…”
Section: Representation Of Linear Operators Within Non-orthogonal Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently generalized the moment expansion to any compact, self-adjoint, and positive-definite linear operatorT : [50] Assuming a finite (orthonormal) basis {| P 1 i, | P 2 i, …, | P N i} for a subspace of the domain ofT, we showed recently that there is a specific basis set {| ξ 1 i, | ξ 2 i, …, | ξ N i} for the (finite) image ofT which fulfills a partial orthogonality condition with respect to the domain basis:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Reduced Eigensystem Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper, we demonstrated that the density response of a molecule due to the perturbing potential of a neighboring molecule can be described within a few moment expanded states. [50] In this article, we reuse the design of the experiment in order to compare the convergence of the density response with respect to different numbers of employed moment expanded and reduced eigenstates: We choose the perturbative effect of one water molecule on an adjacent one as an elementary example. For simplicity, we use the Hartree potential using the partial charges of one of the most common force field water models (TIP3P) as perturbation.…”
Section: Density Response Of a H 2 O Dimermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29,30,[47][48][49][50] In particular, we generalized these theorems to arbitrary linear, self-adjoint, positive-definite, and compact operators. [50] Within this article, we derived the reduced eigensystem representation as a completion of our development effort toward an efficient representation combined with an efficient determination of the static linear density-density response function. Due to its truncated eigensystem like shape, the enormous reduction of the dimensionality becomes obvious in comparison to the regular eigensystem representation.…”
Section: Summary: On the Different Flavors Of The Density-density Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] In order to tackle this problem, we developed a more efficient, iterative algorithm (referred to as direct moment expansion), which needs a single DFPT calculation per moment expanded state. [49,50] F I G U R E 1 Principal illustration of the response density of the water molecule (right) due to a perturbing water molecule (left). The potential originated from the left water molecule can be expanded at the responding (right) water molecule within a few basis functions…”
The linear density-density response function represents a formulation of the generalized density response of a molecular (or extended) system to arbitrary perturbing potentials. We have recently established an approach for reducing the dimension of the (in principle infinite) eigenspace representation (the moment expansion) and generalized it to arbitrary self-adjoint, positive-definite, and compact linear operators. Here, we present a modified representation-the reduced eigensystem representation-which allows to define a trivial criterion for the convergence of the approximation to the density response. By means of this novel eigensystem-like structure, the remarkable reduction of the dimensionality becomes apparent for the calculation of the density-density response function.
The authors present a proof‐of‐concept study for the calculation of atomic forces on a solvated molecule by means of the linear density–density response function in its moment expanded representation. The density–density response function represents an efficient way to compute molecular forces for arbitrary external potentials via an ab initio scheme, without the need to perform an explicit self‐consistent quantum chemical calculation for each configuration of the chemical environment. Here, the authors show that it is indeed possible to determine the atomic forces of interacting bulk‐like molecular complexes due to polarization effects of the surrounding molecules with good accuracy. This study represents a significant step the practical applicability of the approach, which is still in a development phase. The potential application of the computational scheme in terms of molecular dynamics simulations is illustrated by considering a variety of cluster conformations, as they would be found within a molecular dynamics trajectory.
Generalized polarizabilities and the molecular charge distribution can describe the response of a molecule in an arbitrary static electric field up to second order.Depending on the expansion functions used to describe the perturbing potential, the generalized polarizability matrix can have rather large dimension (~1000). This matrix is the discretized version of the density response function or electronic susceptibility.Diagonalizing and truncating it can lead to significant (over an order of magnitude) speed-up in simulations. We have analyzed the convergence behavior of the generalized polarizability using a plane wave basis for the potential. The eigenfunctions of the generalized polarizability matrix are the natural polarization potentials. They are potentially useful to construct efficient polarizability models for molecules.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.