2008
DOI: 10.1021/es800962m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution with Fe@Fe2O3 Core−Shell Nanowires

Abstract: The batch removal of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater with Fe@Fe2O3 core-shell nanowires (FCSNs) was investigated in this study. Itwas found that each gram of the FCSNs could remove 7.78 mg of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater containing 8.0 mg L(-1) of Cr(VI) with an initial pH of 6.5 at room temperature. The Freundlich adsorption isotherm was applicable to describe the removal processes. Kinetics of the Cr(VI) removal was found to follow pseudo-second-order rate equation. Furthermore, the as-prepared and Cr(V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
151
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
151
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though reduction of Cr VI at the surface of secondary mineral layers was initially believed to be slow [88], recent studies revealed that, actually, Cr VI may be rapidly sequestrated at the surface of Fe II -bearing minerals containing structural Fe II and/or Fe II impurities, following an adsorption-reduction mechanism [96,97]. Cr VI adsorption onto positively charged iron and/or chromium oxyhidroxide layers surrounding Fe 0 particles was regarded not only as an intermediate step, but also as an important Cr VI removal mechanism by itself [98][99][100][101]. It has been shown that adsorption processes may contribute not only to the removal of Cr VI , but also to the removal of the resulted Cr III [61,86,92].…”
Section: More Recent Laboratory-scale Reports (Post Elisabeth City Prb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though reduction of Cr VI at the surface of secondary mineral layers was initially believed to be slow [88], recent studies revealed that, actually, Cr VI may be rapidly sequestrated at the surface of Fe II -bearing minerals containing structural Fe II and/or Fe II impurities, following an adsorption-reduction mechanism [96,97]. Cr VI adsorption onto positively charged iron and/or chromium oxyhidroxide layers surrounding Fe 0 particles was regarded not only as an intermediate step, but also as an important Cr VI removal mechanism by itself [98][99][100][101]. It has been shown that adsorption processes may contribute not only to the removal of Cr VI , but also to the removal of the resulted Cr III [61,86,92].…”
Section: More Recent Laboratory-scale Reports (Post Elisabeth City Prb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of costly chemicals and poor removal capacity limit the application of these treatments (Park et al 2005;Park et al 2007). Therefore, researchers have investigated a variety of sorbents for the removal of chromium(VI) from water (Bai and Deng 2004;Mohanty et al 2005;Abdel-Halim et al 2006;Park et al 2006a,b;Zubair et al 2008;Zhang et al 2008;Gurgel et al 2009;Lo and Mak 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these methods require either high energy or large quantities of chemicals. Adsorption method is very popular due to its simplicity and low cost (Ahn et al 2009;Gurgel et al 2009), and it is known to be more effective and versatile technique for heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions, especially when combined with an appropriate desorption method (Ai et al 2008). Certain properties, such as high mechanical and thermal stability and high sorption capacity, should be considered for the adsorbent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%