2022
DOI: 10.3390/nano12020291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Removal of Cr(VI) by TiO2 Based Micro-Nano Reactor via the Synergy of Adsorption and Photocatalysis

Abstract: The low-toxicity treatment of chromium-containing wastewater represents an important way of addressing key environmental problems. In this study, a core-shell structural ZIF-8@TiO2 photocatalyst was synthesized by a simple one-step hydrothermal method. The obtained composite photocatalyst possessed improved photocatalytic activity compared with TiO2. The results indicated that the optimized ZIF-8@TiO2 composite exhibited the highest removal efficiency with 93.1% of Cr(VI) after 120 min under UV-vis irradiation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentages of Cr(VI) and Fe(III) removal were 70 and 63%, respectively, after 360 min. These values were consistent with those reported in the literature for these ions [ [68] , [69] , [70] ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The percentages of Cr(VI) and Fe(III) removal were 70 and 63%, respectively, after 360 min. These values were consistent with those reported in the literature for these ions [ [68] , [69] , [70] ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As previously explained, TiO2 has an abundant number of hydroxyl group compounds on its surface. In acidic conditions, many positive charges are generated on the surface of TiO2 [29]. As shown in Figure 8, elevated concentrations of TiO2 and hydroxyl groups are generated, leading to an intensified electrostatic interaction with Cr(VI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure 4a, when the Cr(VI) concentration gradually increases from 0.08 µM to 80 µM, the overall photocurrent at the same measuring time steadily decreases. The corresponding Cr 2p XPS peak in Figure 4b could be fitted into two main peaks: the one located at lower binding energy (573.1 eV) corresponds to Cr(III), and the other peak centered at higher binding energy (575.4 eV) originates from Cr(VI) [34,35]. It is obvious that the area ratio of the Cr(III) sub-peak to the total peak for the sample being tested in the higher-concentration Cr(VI) is larger than that in the lower-concentration Cr(VI), confirming the presence of more Cr(III) in the photocathode surface for the Cr(VI) solution with a higher concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%