2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00236-015-0248-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient processing of simple temporal networks with uncertainty: algorithms for dynamic controllability verification

Abstract: Temporal formalisms are essential for reasoning about actions that are carried out over time. The exact durations of such actions are generally hard to predict. In temporal planning, the resulting uncertainty is often worked around by only considering upper bounds on durations, with the assumption that when an action happens to be executed more quickly, the plan will still succeed. However, this assumption is often false: If we finish cooking too early, the dinner will be cold before everyone is ready to eat.U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An STNU is said to be Dynamically Controllable (Hunsberger, 2009;Morris et al, 2001;Morris, 2014;Vidal & Fargier, 1999) if there is a strategy for scheduling each executable timepoint that depends only on observations that are available in the past or present at the time it is scheduled. 1 Whether an STNU is Dynamically Controllable or not can be determined by algorithms that run in cubic time (Cairo et al, 2018;Cairo & Rizzi, 2017;Morris, 2014;Nilsson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Stnumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An STNU is said to be Dynamically Controllable (Hunsberger, 2009;Morris et al, 2001;Morris, 2014;Vidal & Fargier, 1999) if there is a strategy for scheduling each executable timepoint that depends only on observations that are available in the past or present at the time it is scheduled. 1 Whether an STNU is Dynamically Controllable or not can be determined by algorithms that run in cubic time (Cairo et al, 2018;Cairo & Rizzi, 2017;Morris, 2014;Nilsson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Stnumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now add initial support for actions with uncontrollable durations, using E2IDC (Nilsson, Kvarnström, and Doherty 2016) to incrementally verify dynamic controllability.…”
Section: Tfpop With Uncontrollable Durationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Note that a wait or conditional edge reduces to an ordinary edge in each projection (Morris 2014). ) Reduction rules in recent STNU work (Shah et al 2007;Nilsson, Kvarnström, and Doherty 2013;Morris 2014;Nilsson, Kvarnström, and Doherty 2015) involve "plus-minus" rules where a non-negative AB edge followed by a BC negative edge may result in an added AC edge. It is not difficult to see that applying "plus-minus" transformation rules repeatedly to a shortest path will eventually result in a veepath where all the remaining negative edges precede all the remaining non-negative edges.…”
Section: Temporal Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%