2016
DOI: 10.3141/2557-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Priority Control Model for Multimodal Traffic Signals

Abstract: The paper presents a model for multimodal traffic signal priority control. The approach is based on an analytical model and a flexible implementation algorithm that considers real-time vehicle actuation. The analytical model considers the needs of different modes in a real-time connected vehicle environment. The model provides an optimal signal schedule that minimizes the total weighted priority request delay. The flexible implementation algorithm is designed to guarantee that the optimal signal schedule is ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section describes the priority control model utilized for the study. The control logic developed in a study [13] was implemented. A mixed-integer linear program and a flexible implementation algorithm were utilized considering real-time vehicle actuation.…”
Section: Fsp Priority Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section describes the priority control model utilized for the study. The control logic developed in a study [13] was implemented. A mixed-integer linear program and a flexible implementation algorithm were utilized considering real-time vehicle actuation.…”
Section: Fsp Priority Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the priority request vehicle gets off the intersection or when the speed of the vehicle is out of a predefined threshold, the priority request is updated. This process is explained in detail in literature [13].…”
Section: Fsp Priority Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic Signal Priority Systems (TSPS) are giving less attention in the literature compared to TSCS. Such systems can be classified into six cathegories [40] which are; pre-emption versus priority (pre-emption can be considered as the highest level of priority), one approach versus conflicting approaches, active transit signal priority versus passive transit signal priority, signal mode versus multiple mode, signal intersection versus coordinated intesection, and one request at a time versus multiple request. The majority of TSPS in the literature relies on electronics techology allowing the detection of EVs, the communication between those vehicles and traffic signals.…”
Section: An Overview On Traffic Signals Control and Priority Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure the accuracy of the bus arrival time and minimize the adverse effects on the general traffic, a new priority sequence between the two successive stations was proposed by Hao et al [13]. To resolve conflicting priority requests among social vehicles, pedestrians, buses, and emergency vehicles, Zamanipour et al designed a priority decision framework with multiple models under connected vehicle environment and used the weights of all kinds of vehicles as the basis for determining the priority decision [14]. He et al formulated a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) under multirequest which explicitly accommodated multiple priority requests from different modes of vehicles and pedestrians while simultaneously considering coordination and vehicle actuation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%