2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient permutation testing of variable importance measures by the example of random forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decrease in model performance post-permutation suggests the predictor variable’s pivotal role in model accuracy, while minimal impact indicates less influence [ 80 ]. However, this technique may pose computational challenges, particularly with large datasets [ 81 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in model performance post-permutation suggests the predictor variable’s pivotal role in model accuracy, while minimal impact indicates less influence [ 80 ]. However, this technique may pose computational challenges, particularly with large datasets [ 81 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood-based permutation variable importance measures (VIMPs) of this final model were used to identify informative predictor variables. 30 , 31 Predictor variables with a VIMP lower than the VIMP of an additionally included random variable were excluded from VIMP display. 32 To further evaluate the counterfactual analysis, the MS-TDS was calculated assuming both treatment alternatives for each patient and compared between the actual medication groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before building our prediction models we wanted to see if we could build predictive features from group level differences in frequency band power across the different states. We used Welch's method to calculate power in delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), low gamma (30-50 Hz) and high gamma (50-100 Hz). The power was calculated per 3 s samples and normalized to overall power in the sample and then averaged within and across channels, resulting in one power value per round, band, side and state for each subject.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A permutation test provides only approximate p-values unless all possible permutations are computed for an exact test [25]. A sequential approximation to the general permutation test (SAPT) was used to stop permuting when adequate number of permutations had been done to either reject or accept the null hypothesis of no difference [26,27]. This method controls the type I error rate while achieving power close to the exact permutation test but with a significant reduction in number of permutations.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%