2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b1-199-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Orientation and Calibration of Large Aerial Blocks of Multi-Camera Platforms

Abstract: KEY WORDS: multi-sensor calibration, oblique aerial imagery, tie point decimation, bundle block adjustment, affine-invariant feature point ABSTRACT:Aerial multi-camera platforms typically incorporate a nadir-looking camera accompanied by further cameras that provide oblique views, potentially resulting in utmost coverage, redundancy, and accuracy even on vertical surfaces. However, issues have remained unresolved with the orientation and calibration of the resulting imagery, to two of which we present feasible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, they do not provide support for constraining relative orientation parameters (ROP) between cameras in a multi-camera setup, which is also the case for the approach of Toldo et al (2015) as well as for the automated image orientation packages evaluated in Remondino et al (2012). Moreover, oblique images from the individual camera heads are usually treated independently in aerial triangulation (Cavegn et al, 2014;Rupnik et al, 2015;Karel et al, 2016). However, Sun et al (2016) parameterize oblique camera poses with nadir camera poses as well as constant relative poses between oblique and nadir cameras, so that the number of unknown parameters and the dimension of the normal equations decrease, which dramatically reduces the computational complexity and memory cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, they do not provide support for constraining relative orientation parameters (ROP) between cameras in a multi-camera setup, which is also the case for the approach of Toldo et al (2015) as well as for the automated image orientation packages evaluated in Remondino et al (2012). Moreover, oblique images from the individual camera heads are usually treated independently in aerial triangulation (Cavegn et al, 2014;Rupnik et al, 2015;Karel et al, 2016). However, Sun et al (2016) parameterize oblique camera poses with nadir camera poses as well as constant relative poses between oblique and nadir cameras, so that the number of unknown parameters and the dimension of the normal equations decrease, which dramatically reduces the computational complexity and memory cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%