1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient object scatter correction algorithm for third and fourth generation CT scanners

Abstract: X-ray photons which are scattered inside the object slice and reach the detector array increase the detected signal and produce image artifacts as "cupping" effects in large objects and dark bands between regions of high attenuation. The artifact amplitudes increase with scanned volume or slice width. Object scatter can be reduced in third generation computed tomography (CT) geometry by collimating the detector elements. However, a correction can still improve image quality. For fourth generation CT geometry, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
151
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple stationary detectors may be needed for greater volume coverage and higher spatial resolution. New reconstruction algorithms may reduce the cone beam-induced artifacts 24 and allow ECG-gated reconstruction from nonspiral continuous acquisition.…”
Section: Possible Future Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple stationary detectors may be needed for greater volume coverage and higher spatial resolution. New reconstruction algorithms may reduce the cone beam-induced artifacts 24 and allow ECG-gated reconstruction from nonspiral continuous acquisition.…”
Section: Possible Future Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the transmission values of copper and air at an x-ray energy of 60 keV for a thickness of 0.23 mm. Scatter was simulated using a convolution-based scatter model 8 and added to the simulated intensity data. To demonstrate that this is a realistic simulation scenario, an additional Monte Carlo simulation of the modulator without Fļ©ļ§.…”
Section: C Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard approach is the insertion of an antiscatter grid, which removes a certain amount of the scattered radiation while most of the desired primary radiation reaches the detector. Other methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] try to compute the scatter from the image itself, either using convolutionbased approaches or even more sophisticated solutions based on Monte Carlo simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable derivation of a feasible implementation, we now follow the method of Rinkel et al'Ā° in assuming the attenuation factor a08 is equal to that of photons scattered at 0 = 0, i.e., = exp { J t(x, ) dx} (12) where x represents position along the line connecting the source and j5, and x is the location of j5 (the detector pixel behind' v). This assumption enables the simplification rxp apreapost = exp { J (x, ) dx} (13) where I is the primary (scatter-free) x-ray intensity and the second equality arises from the Beer-Lambert Law.…”
Section: Total Intensity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%