2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88690-7_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient NCC-Based Image Matching in Walsh-Hadamard Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For FOHT, since one image is preprocessed only once for every group, the time proportion of preprocessing is reduced greatly in comparison with computing of HPVs, making it faster than OHT N in all the results that Figs. 11,12,13,14 show. Moreover, in general the advantage of FOHT over OHT N is more obvious about speed-ups for bigger patterns.…”
Section: Experiments For Matching Multiple Patternsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For FOHT, since one image is preprocessed only once for every group, the time proportion of preprocessing is reduced greatly in comparison with computing of HPVs, making it faster than OHT N in all the results that Figs. 11,12,13,14 show. Moreover, in general the advantage of FOHT over OHT N is more obvious about speed-ups for bigger patterns.…”
Section: Experiments For Matching Multiple Patternsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to reduce the computational complexity and time cost, a lot of fast algorithms are proposed as an alternative to the full search algorithm, some of them using normalized correlation as similarity [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and some of them using the sum of absolute differences (SAD), the sum of squared differences (SSD) or L p distance as dissimilarity. Certainly, general pattern matching may use the Hamming distance [15], or even use the dissimilarity between pattern descriptors and candidate window descriptors [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity score plays a key role in measuring confidence and distinguishing the target object from the background. The most widely used off-the-shelf techniques are pixel-wise methods such as SSD, SAD, and normalised crosscorrelation (NCC) [7,8], owing to their simplicity and efficiency. These methods have been combined with tone mapping [9] for handling illumination change, with asymmetric correlation [10] to deal with noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the result on illumination-change-only dataset significantly degrades when the appearance term or the rank term is not included, which is consistent with our previous discussion. Furthermore, we show the affect of verifying the proportion between the appearance term and the rank term by varying the parameter šœ† 3 in Equation (8). Results are summarised in Table 3.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two factors influencing computation overheads. One is what similarity measures, including cross-correlation (CC) [5] [6], normalized crosscorrelation (NCC) [7] [8], and sum of squared differences (SSD) [9], are used. Similarity measure influences performances as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%