2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient methodologies for reliability-based design optimization of composite panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…López et al (2017) conducted deterministic and reliability-based design optimisations of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling regime; they conducted a decoupled RBDO which separates the reliability analysis from the deterministic optimisation. Further RBDO studies of stiffened panel have been conducted by, for instance, Qu and Haftka (2003), who conducted RBDO and computed the reliability constraints employing Monte Carlo sampling and a design response surface, and Díaz et al (2016), who performed a comparison of stochastic expansions and moment-based methods for the reliability analysis while using genetic and gradient-based techniques for deterministic optimisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…López et al (2017) conducted deterministic and reliability-based design optimisations of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling regime; they conducted a decoupled RBDO which separates the reliability analysis from the deterministic optimisation. Further RBDO studies of stiffened panel have been conducted by, for instance, Qu and Haftka (2003), who conducted RBDO and computed the reliability constraints employing Monte Carlo sampling and a design response surface, and Díaz et al (2016), who performed a comparison of stochastic expansions and moment-based methods for the reliability analysis while using genetic and gradient-based techniques for deterministic optimisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this issue, surrogate models built based on design inputs and outputs have been widely used in recent years [19]. The use of surrogate models instead of real models drastically reduces the computational cost of the design optimization methods [20]. Accordingly, the frequently used surrogate models are Kriging model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model and Polynomial models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is nowadays one of the most widespread methods and its performance is widely demonstrated in the literature, for instance, in [21]. In the field of aerodynamics, some applications can be found, as for instance, the work of [22], which employs Kriging surrogate models for optimizing the shape of a building by means of changing the corners of the shape.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Response By Means Of Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%