2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient method using Whale Optimization Algorithm for reliability-based design optimization of labyrinth spillway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific models have been created to handle RBDO as well, like the Kriging model, used to improve the computational efficiency by interpolating values through a Gaussian process governed by previous covariances [44], [45]. Other models involve a hybrid of various techniques to increase efficiency, such as combining the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) with a hybrid Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [46]. RBDO is utilized for a number of reasons, the first being that it allows for simulating and optimizing a scenario that would either be too costly [47], [48], would be too unsafe [49] or would be unfeasible [50] to run a physical model.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific models have been created to handle RBDO as well, like the Kriging model, used to improve the computational efficiency by interpolating values through a Gaussian process governed by previous covariances [44], [45]. Other models involve a hybrid of various techniques to increase efficiency, such as combining the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) with a hybrid Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [46]. RBDO is utilized for a number of reasons, the first being that it allows for simulating and optimizing a scenario that would either be too costly [47], [48], would be too unsafe [49] or would be unfeasible [50] to run a physical model.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating and validating the prediction effects of the improved ANN, the root mean squared error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), the MAPE, and the determination coefficient (R 2 ) are employed in this study. The four evaluation indexes are defined as 32 : RMSE=1mfalse∑i=1m()yigoodbreak−yfalsêi2 MAE=1mfalse∑i=1m()yigoodbreak−yfalsêi MAPE=1mfalse∑i=1m||yitrueŷiyi×100% normalR2=1false∑i()yfalsêigoodbreak−yi2false∑i()ytrue¯igoodbreak−yi2 …”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the errors between the output results (efficiency and cost rate) and the ideal results are calculated by the activation function. The activation function and the error function are given by Equations ( 31) and (32).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2020 ; Jafari-Asl et al. 2021 ; El-Fergany et al. 2019 ), it still suffers from the local minima and the low convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%