2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo for combined Subset Simulation and nonlinear finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated the binomial log-likelihood to compare the model-based age- and HPV type-specific curves of prevalence with the observed outcomes and we selected the 10 model-generated curves that fittest best. Although this classical approach is less efficient than applying a Markov Chain Monte Carlo calibration 21 , the accuracy and validity of the final model parameters are the same.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the binomial log-likelihood to compare the model-based age- and HPV type-specific curves of prevalence with the observed outcomes and we selected the 10 model-generated curves that fittest best. Although this classical approach is less efficient than applying a Markov Chain Monte Carlo calibration 21 , the accuracy and validity of the final model parameters are the same.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous ACFs to describe the degree of correlation between two points irrespective of their 7 global coordinate [30,31]. The most applied ACF used to illustrate the spatial variability of soil characteristics is the Exponential Auto-Correlation Function (E-ACF) [35][36][37], which is given by:…”
Section: Random Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability index was introduced because its value is easier for people to compare than the probability of failure, which in the case of civil engineering is very low. There are numerous methods that are used to estimate the reliability index, including approximation methods (FORM, SORM) [2][3][4], simulation methods (Monte Carlo, Subset Simulation) [5][6][7], Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) [8][9][10], Response Surface Method [11][12][13] or Artificial Neural Networks [14][15][16]. The biggest problem with most of mentioned method is that they are appropriate for analysis of individual limit state functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%