The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cit.2010.482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Localized Detection of Erroneous Nodes (ELDEN)

Abstract: Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have attracted considerable research effort in the community during the past couple of years. One of the most challenging issues so far is the extension of network lifetime with regards to small battery capacity and self-sustained operation. Endeavors to save energy have been made on various frontiers, ranging from hardware improvements over medium access and routing protocols to network clustering and role changing strategies. Only weak attention has been paid to the detection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, current quantile-based distributed fault-detection methods do not set intervals based on historical data but rather perform fault detection based on multiple data from neighboring nodes simultaneously. For example, the process of the quantile fault-detection method proposed in the literature [ 34 ] consists of:…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current quantile-based distributed fault-detection methods do not set intervals based on historical data but rather perform fault detection based on multiple data from neighboring nodes simultaneously. For example, the process of the quantile fault-detection method proposed in the literature [ 34 ] consists of:…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one node is voted by all its neighbors, the node will be regarded as an abnormal node. As an improvement to the simple voting, the voting methods discussed in Xiao et al 18 and Behnke et al 19 were affected by the weights between nodes. The method presented in Xiao et al 18 required that the nodes be connected only when they are similar, which make the voting credible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presented in Xiao et al 18 required that the nodes be connected only when they are similar, which make the voting credible. The Efficient Localized Detection of Erroneous Nodes (ELDEN) proposed by Behnke et al 19 computed the weight through the distance between nodes and every node chooses the median of its neighbors to compare with its own state value. Then the difference will be normalized by the weight and becomes the final difference Y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%