2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient internalization of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles of different sizes by primary human macrophages and dendritic cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(102 reference statements)
4
99
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…studies have indicated that dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages, which are especially abundant in the mucosae and the skin, not only undergo oxidative stress, necrosis, and apoptosis but also overexpress T lymphocyte-stimulating proteins, such as major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II), CD80, and CD86, and secrete several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines when they are treated with a variety of NPs (mesoporous silica NPs [SiO 2 NPs], TiO 2 NPs, and silica-coated iron dioxide and TiO 2 NPs) (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Consistent with that finding, in mouse models, various modified silica NPs increased the efficacy with which DCs induced the differentiation of gamma interferon (IFN-␥)-producing CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes (Tc1), a phenotype linked with tissue inflammatory diseases, such as delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), characterized by macrophage and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) infiltration (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studies have indicated that dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages, which are especially abundant in the mucosae and the skin, not only undergo oxidative stress, necrosis, and apoptosis but also overexpress T lymphocyte-stimulating proteins, such as major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II), CD80, and CD86, and secrete several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines when they are treated with a variety of NPs (mesoporous silica NPs [SiO 2 NPs], TiO 2 NPs, and silica-coated iron dioxide and TiO 2 NPs) (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Consistent with that finding, in mouse models, various modified silica NPs increased the efficacy with which DCs induced the differentiation of gamma interferon (IFN-␥)-producing CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes (Tc1), a phenotype linked with tissue inflammatory diseases, such as delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), characterized by macrophage and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) infiltration (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Moreover, silica-coated SPIO nanoparticles, rather than dextran-coated nanoparticles, displayed dose-dependent cytotoxicity. 30 In our study, none of the nanoparticle formulations affected the viability of the macrophages ( Figure 3B). Our dextran-coated nanoparticles are safer than nanoparticles coated with aminosiline and silica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Our dextran-coated nanoparticles are safer than nanoparticles coated with aminosiline and silica. 29,30 The different charge and coating states of the surface potential did not influence the cell viability of cultured macrophages in the four types of SPIO and USPIO contrast agents that we used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In many cases, the toxic effects are dose dependent and related to specific nanoparticle composition aspects. 119 Composition has been shown to be clearly related to potential adverse effects and in general for their performance as cell labelling agent for a large variety of nanoparticle as also illustrated in the section on nanoparticle composition.…”
Section: Effects Of Nanoparticle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%