2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Interference-Aware Power Control for Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this, as the PDR increases, the throughput also gets increased. Here, Basic Power Control mechanism (BPC) and Adaptive Range‐based Power Control (ARPC) are designed only to circumvent interference and not for concurrent transmissions of lowest throughput distances from 100 and 400 m. Unlike the others, such as RCSS‐MAC, Interference Resistant Multiple Access (IRMA), Interference‐Aware Power Control (IAPC), and Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR) based Transmission Power Control (STPC) are designed for concurrent transmissions. Comparing with IAPC and ARPC, RCSS‐MAC protocol achieves 13.5% and 17% throughput enhancement when d is 100 and 400 m. Compared with STPC, RCSS‐MAC achieves 35% throughput improvement when d = 100 m and 53% improved when d = 400 m. Throughput can be minimized due to concurrent transmission.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this, as the PDR increases, the throughput also gets increased. Here, Basic Power Control mechanism (BPC) and Adaptive Range‐based Power Control (ARPC) are designed only to circumvent interference and not for concurrent transmissions of lowest throughput distances from 100 and 400 m. Unlike the others, such as RCSS‐MAC, Interference Resistant Multiple Access (IRMA), Interference‐Aware Power Control (IAPC), and Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR) based Transmission Power Control (STPC) are designed for concurrent transmissions. Comparing with IAPC and ARPC, RCSS‐MAC protocol achieves 13.5% and 17% throughput enhancement when d is 100 and 400 m. Compared with STPC, RCSS‐MAC achieves 35% throughput improvement when d = 100 m and 53% improved when d = 400 m. Throughput can be minimized due to concurrent transmission.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the adoption of Universal Software Radio Peripherals (USRP) dedicated devices [12] made it possible to improve the accuracy of the interference generation systems to higher levels and has been adopted as a possible solution for testing interference-aware power control mechanisms [13], [14]. However, they currently represent a too costly solution because of the need of specialized hardware, which makes it difficult an adoption on large scale testbeds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the interference produced by adjacent APs and users, the APs can turn to idle channel to reduce co-channel interference [8], [11]. Moreover, power control schemes have been introduced to adjust the coverage area and transmit signal strength to improve throughput [12], [13]. Existing power control schemes are often approach coverage problems by increasing power, which leads to detrimental results (i.e.,interference, delay).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%