The toluene (TOL)–methylcyclohexane (MCH) system
is one
of the viable solutions because of its high stability and high hydrogen
storage capacity (6.2%). However, the high volatilities of TOL and
MCH and the accumulative byproducts make it difficult to transport
hydrogen. Considering these limitations, we developed a new strategy
introducing an extraction column and pressure swing adsorption with
heat integration to reduce the required energy utilities. Furthermore,
a comprehensive system-level analysis was conducted through an application
example of the transport of hydrogen from Australia to Korea. The
minimum transport cost of hydrogen was determined to be $2.17/kg-H2 via techno-economic analysis. Sensitivity and uncertainty
analyses revealed the influence of the economic and process parameters.
Finally, a life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental
impact (EI) of each part. Although dehydrogenation is more energy-demanding
than hydrogenation, hydrogenation has larger EIs for some factors
including fossil resource scarcity (13% larger) and water consumption
(746% larger), due to the toluene and hydrogen makeup. Furthermore,
we compared changes in the EIs in the energy sources. This study can
provide insights into the optimization and decision-making of hydrogen
supply chains to revitalize the hydrogen economy.