The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2015.7351322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient image-space extraction and representation of 3D surface topography

Abstract: Surface topography refers to the geometric micro-structure of a surface and defines its tactile characteristics (typically in the sub-millimeter range). High-resolution 3D scanning techniques developed recently enable the 3D reconstruction of surfaces including their surface topography. In this paper, we present an efficient image-space technique for the extraction of surface topography from high-resolution 3D reconstructions. Additionally, we filter noise and enhance topographic attributes to obtain an improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This normalization can be efficiently performed in a pre-processing step by subtracting a smoothed version of the depth map (Gaussian filter with σ = 12.5 mm) from the depth map. This operation results in a local constrast equalization across the depth map [12] that better enhances the fine geometric details of the surface texture.…”
Section: Baseline Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This normalization can be efficiently performed in a pre-processing step by subtracting a smoothed version of the depth map (Gaussian filter with σ = 12.5 mm) from the depth map. This operation results in a local constrast equalization across the depth map [12] that better enhances the fine geometric details of the surface texture.…”
Section: Baseline Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we apply Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [22], [23], which currently show best performance on standard semantic segmentation benchmarks [17]- [19], [24], [25] and compare them with the RF-based approach. We have shown previously that surface segmentation with 3D descriptors computed directly from the 3D point clouds is computationally demanding and with current state-of-the-art methods not performing well, see [12] for respective results for a subset of our dataset. Hence, we employ the depth maps and orthophotos generated from the point clouds as input to segmentation.…”
Section: B Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, we enhance the depth map to extract and emphasize the fine geometric structures related to the peck-marks that make up petroglyph shapes with the method of Zeppelzauer & Seidl [21]. A classifier is trained on the enhanced map that generates probabilities for each pixel.…”
Section: D Segmentation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(b)). To enhance local structures of peck-marks we locally filter the deviation map by a Gaussian filter, see [21] for a detailed description. Locations where the filter matches well (e.g.…”
Section: A Data Preprocessing and Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%