2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3141104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Hardware Implementation of Large Field-Size Elliptic Curve Cryptographic Processor

Abstract: Along with the rapid development in security technology, the efficient implementation of a large field-size elliptic curve cryptosystem (ECC) is becoming demanding in many critical applications as small-sized cryptosystems are gradually becoming obsolete. Based on this consideration, this paper proposes a series of novel coherent interdependence efforts to propose a novel implementation of ECC hardware cryptoprocessor: (i) We firstly propose a new Montgomery point multiplication (PM) algorithm to optimize and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to [20], which has the lowest area implementation over GF (2 409 ), our design saves 9.52% of FPGA slices and shows 8% efficiency improvement. As compared to [11,17] our design saves 41.69% and 63.9% of FPGA slices and shows 30% and 35% efficiency improvement, respectively. Moreover, our design implemented on Virtex 5 and Virtex 6 outperforms [10,12,33] in terms of efficiency.…”
Section: Implementation Results Over Gf(2 409 )mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to [20], which has the lowest area implementation over GF (2 409 ), our design saves 9.52% of FPGA slices and shows 8% efficiency improvement. As compared to [11,17] our design saves 41.69% and 63.9% of FPGA slices and shows 30% and 35% efficiency improvement, respectively. Moreover, our design implemented on Virtex 5 and Virtex 6 outperforms [10,12,33] in terms of efficiency.…”
Section: Implementation Results Over Gf(2 409 )mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, our design is 3.54% faster than [20] and shows 3% efficiency improvement. As compared to [11,14,17,21], our design saves 55.6%, 88.5%, 66.77%, and 58.25% of FPGA slices and shows 52%, 79%, 47%, and 10% efficiency improvement respectively.…”
Section: Implementation Results Over Gf(2 571 )mentioning
confidence: 92%