2016
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI

Abstract: PurposeTo propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements.MethodsThe gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data were acquired in a phantom filled with cyclooctane, and corrections for gradient scaling errors and nonlinearity were determined. The calibration was assessed with diffusion tensor imaging and independently validated with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the applied b-value depends on the square of the gradient amplitude, calibration of diffusion measurements in a reference phantom with known diffusivity offers a quick, sensitive and accurate method for gradient calibration 19 . This calibration method was performed prior to the high resolution DTI experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the applied b-value depends on the square of the gradient amplitude, calibration of diffusion measurements in a reference phantom with known diffusivity offers a quick, sensitive and accurate method for gradient calibration 19 . This calibration method was performed prior to the high resolution DTI experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, obtaining robust DTI measurements at high spatial resolution remains a challenge, even ex vivo . Current limitations of DTI include poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), long acquisition times 18 , sensitivity to gradient calibration 19 and temperature variations 20 , and difficulty distinguishing v 2 from v 3 in the presence of noise 21 . To overcome these obstacles, we implemented a set of refinements to increase SNR and spatial resolution, minimise orientation bias in diffusion-weighting, and reduce temperature variation in DTI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TR was specified at 250 ms to maximize signal-to-noise (SNR) efficiency, and TE was set to a minimum (9.3 ms). Other imaging parameters were as follows: echo spacing = 4.9 ms, echo train length = 8, FOV = 21.6 × 14.4 × 14.4 mm 3 , resolution = 100 × 100 × 100 μm 3 , number of diffusion weighted (DW) directions = 30 forward + 30 reverse, number of non-DW (b = 0) images = 4, b effective = 1000 s/mm 2 [32], diffusion gradient duration (δ) = 2 ms, diffusion time (Δ) = 5.5 ms. Total acquisition time per heart was 11.5 h.…”
Section: Diffusion Tensor Cmr Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, other larger and more complex phantom designs have been proposed for monitoring geometric accuracy or performing 3D geometric distortion correction in preclinical MRI [18, 2931], but their size inhibits their use with various imaging coils, they generally have lower construction precision and are currently not as cost-effective; as such, they were not used in this multicenter study. LEGO bricks were also used successfully for the development of clinical phantoms before [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%