2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient generation of matrix elements for one-electron spin–orbit operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained energies are in reasonable agreement with previously reported TDDFT and DFT/MRCI results. [17,18,[21][22][23] However, the calculated TDDFT energies of the T 1 and T 2 states now are considerably lower than the respective DFT/MRCI values. As a consequence, the DFT/MRCI method predicts significantly smaller energy distances between the lowest triplet and singlet excited states than does TDDFT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained energies are in reasonable agreement with previously reported TDDFT and DFT/MRCI results. [17,18,[21][22][23] However, the calculated TDDFT energies of the T 1 and T 2 states now are considerably lower than the respective DFT/MRCI values. As a consequence, the DFT/MRCI method predicts significantly smaller energy distances between the lowest triplet and singlet excited states than does TDDFT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[17,18,[22][23][24][25] The TDDFT energies of most pp* excited singlet states are characterized by systematic upshifts of % 0.3 eV compared to the DFT/MRCI results. In contrast, the TDDFT singlet transitions of np* type are stabilized by % 0.2 eV in comparison to the respective DFT/MRCI values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first, one-step, spin-orbit coupling treatment directly diagonalizesĤ in a basis which does not assume spin symmetry. [77][78][79] The second, two-step, state-interaction method expands the eigenstates ofĤ in terms of the spin-pure eigenstates ofĤ SR . 53,54,80,81 The coefficients of expansion may be determined using different methods, such as perturbation theory [82][83][84][85][86] or through diagonalization (state interaction).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%