2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient finite element modelling of eddy current probability of detection with transmitter–receiver sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isso leva à realização de muitos testes e ajustes, que tornam o projeto caro e dependente dos recursos humanos muitas vezes não disponíveis. Dentre as técnicas de simulação numérica mais utilizada, destaca-se o método dos elementos finitos (MEF), que pode ser visto em detalhes em Rosell (2012) e Bennoud e Zerzoug (2014).…”
Section: Modelagem Numérica Por Elementos Finitosunclassified
“…Isso leva à realização de muitos testes e ajustes, que tornam o projeto caro e dependente dos recursos humanos muitas vezes não disponíveis. Dentre as técnicas de simulação numérica mais utilizada, destaca-se o método dos elementos finitos (MEF), que pode ser visto em detalhes em Rosell (2012) e Bennoud e Zerzoug (2014).…”
Section: Modelagem Numérica Por Elementos Finitosunclassified
“…The proposed LOI-based inverse scheme is verified via finite element modeling [ 20 , 21 ] which gives the simulated observation corresponding to a HMD scenario with u = [1.6 mm, 28.5 MS/m]. The other model parameters are same as those listed in Table 1 and Table 2 .…”
Section: Corroboration Via Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is the model assisted PoD (MAPoD) which mitigates the extensive amount of empirical data required in PoD study [ 13 ]. A wide range of physics-based numerical simulation models for eddy current NDT systems have been proposed [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. The finite element method (FEM), which solves the differential equations, draws extensive attentions in MAPoD study because it is easier to implement than the boundary element method (BEM) or volume element method (VEM), which solve the integral equations [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of physics-based numerical simulation models for eddy current NDT systems have been proposed [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. The finite element method (FEM), which solves the differential equations, draws extensive attentions in MAPoD study because it is easier to implement than the boundary element method (BEM) or volume element method (VEM), which solve the integral equations [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. However, it discretizes the whole solution domain with volume meshes which need large computational resources in both FEM and VEM [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%