1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0055933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient evolution of asymmetric recurrent neural networks using a PDGP-inspired two-dimensional representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poli [1997] presented a very general scheme wherein nodes are connected in a graph which is placed over a two-dimensional grid. Later, recurrent artificial neural networks were designed such that the nodes were synchronously parallel (e.g., [Pujol & Poli, 1998]) and variants exist in which some nodes can update more frequently than others (see [Poli, 1999] for an overview). Miller (e.g., [1999]) has presented a graph-based representation scheme originally designed to consider the hardware implementation of the evolved program wherein a twodimensional grid of sequentially updating, connected logic blocks is produced.…”
Section: Evolving Graph-based Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poli [1997] presented a very general scheme wherein nodes are connected in a graph which is placed over a two-dimensional grid. Later, recurrent artificial neural networks were designed such that the nodes were synchronously parallel (e.g., [Pujol & Poli, 1998]) and variants exist in which some nodes can update more frequently than others (see [Poli, 1999] for an overview). Miller (e.g., [1999]) has presented a graph-based representation scheme originally designed to consider the hardware implementation of the evolved program wherein a twodimensional grid of sequentially updating, connected logic blocks is produced.…”
Section: Evolving Graph-based Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many schemes were considered in preparation of these experiments, prioritising flexibility, scalability, difficulty and efficiency. These included Connectionist Encoding [17], Node Based Encoding [18], Graph Based Encoding [19], Layer Based Encoding [20], Marker Based Encoding [21], Matrix Re-writing [22], [23], Cellular Encoding [24], Weight-based encoding [25], [26] and Architecture encoding [27].…”
Section: Encoding and Decoding Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, recursive connections are permitted and each node is executed with synchronous parallelism for some number of cycles before an output node's value is taken. Poli (e.g., [39]) presented a similar scheme wherein the graph is placed over a two-dimensional grid and executes its nodes synchronously in parallel. Connections are directed upwards and are only permitted between nodes situated on adjacent rows; however by including identity (i.e., pass-through) functions, connections between non-adjacent layers are possible and thus any parallel distributed program may be represented.…”
Section: Graph Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%