2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-016-0704-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient evaluation of the material response of tissues reinforced by statistically oriented fibres

Abstract: For several classes of soft biological tissues, modelling complexity is in part due to the arrangement of the collagen fibres. In general, the arrangement of the fibres can be described by defining, at each point in the tissue, the structure tensor (i.e., the tensor product of the unit vector of the local fibre arrangement by itself) and a probability distribution of orientation. In this approach, assuming that the fibres do not interact with each other, the overall contribution of the collagen fibres to a giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational challenge of describing the microstructural properties in a reliable manner motivated the development of several approximations. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The present study departs from the second order approximation of the strain energy density ψ f * of the collagen fiber distribution illustrated in Pandolfi and Vasta. 5 The approximation is based on the second order Taylor expansion of the fiber strain energy density about the fourth pseudo-invariant I 4 = C : A , where A = a ⊗ a is the structure tensor associated to the mean direction a of the fiber distribution, i.e., ψ :…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The computational challenge of describing the microstructural properties in a reliable manner motivated the development of several approximations. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The present study departs from the second order approximation of the strain energy density ψ f * of the collagen fiber distribution illustrated in Pandolfi and Vasta. 5 The approximation is based on the second order Taylor expansion of the fiber strain energy density about the fourth pseudo-invariant I 4 = C : A , where A = a ⊗ a is the structure tensor associated to the mean direction a of the fiber distribution, i.e., ψ :…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The more recent paper of Melnik et al [9] employed a deformation-dependent structure tensor in order to exclude compressed fibres, which the authors applied to uniaxial extension with two families of fibres. The study of Hashlamoun et al [46] also used a Heaviside function to exclude compressed fibres, and the authors compared the results for three different polynomial expansions of the energy function about I 4 = 1, and they also performed comparisons of the Cauchy stresses σ 11 and σ 22 as functions of stretch for equibiaxial and biaxial deformations. Note that the comparison in the exponential case was performed with the same parameters c 1 = k 1 and for c 2 = k 2 = 1 for each case.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex, in some cases unaffordable and computationally demanding, description of the microstructure has pushed for approximations based on the homogenization of the microstructure by means of parameters of the collagen distribution (i.e., average and higher order statistics) in the strain energy density [24][25][26]. Strong homogenization techniques, though, may cancel out the features of the microstructure and compromise the predictive properties of the model at the macroscale [27]. Among countless research papers discussing stochastic models of fiber reinforced materials, only a few contributions have been trying to characterize analytically the probability distribution functions (PDF) by means of statistical descriptors [9,12,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.2(c) visualizes condition(27), which results as a combination of uniaxial and biaxial conditions since it is expressed in the principal stretch reference system. In particular, the w(I 4 ) spans over the whole integration range with lower bound I 4 = 1 and upper boundI 4 = λ 21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%