2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient edge-preserving stereo matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cigla et al [31] separately performed horizontal and vertical aggregations using a similar 1-D filter model with separable successive weighted summations along each direction. A simple exponential function is utilized for computing the similarity between two neighboring pixels.…”
Section: Related Local Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cigla et al [31] separately performed horizontal and vertical aggregations using a similar 1-D filter model with separable successive weighted summations along each direction. A simple exponential function is utilized for computing the similarity between two neighboring pixels.…”
Section: Related Local Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, various methods that reduce the computational complexity and operate rapidly were proposed [12], [15]. Herein, we use four cost aggregation methods: Adapt Weight, Cost Filter, InfoPermeable, and DT Aggregation (DTAggr).…”
Section: Cost Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ∆R, ∆G, and ∆B represent the difference value of two adjacent pixels, and  is the smoothness parameter [12].…”
Section: Infopermeablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, we use cost combining with alpha-blending for the ADCensus, and the final raw cost that is the sum of the pattern cost (T 1 ) and the non-pattern cost (T 2 ). The information permeability filtering(PF) proposed by Cevahir Cigla et al [2] is an ASW approach that has simple parameters and provides constant operational time for calculating cost aggregation. However, because there is no proximity weight term, PF can encounter problems with images containing large untextured regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, we calculate raw cost volume using the AD-Census [2,6]. At this time, we use cost combining with alpha-blending for the ADCensus, and the final raw cost that is the sum of the pattern cost (T 1 ) and the non-pattern cost (T 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%