2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(00)00099-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient discovery of immune response targets by cyclical refinement of QSAR models of peptide binding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of recent work in this important area includes toxicity prediction (Cronin 2000, Freidig andHermens 2001) physicochemical properties prediction (e.g. water solubility, lipophilicity) (Beck et al 2000;Xing and Glen 2002), gastrointestinal absorption (Zhao et al 2001;AgatonovicKustrin et al 2001;Benigni et al 2000), activity of peptides (Brusic et al 2001), data mining, drug metabolism (Lewis 2000), and prediction of other pharmacokinetic and ADME properties. Recent reviews (e.g.…”
Section: Applications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of recent work in this important area includes toxicity prediction (Cronin 2000, Freidig andHermens 2001) physicochemical properties prediction (e.g. water solubility, lipophilicity) (Beck et al 2000;Xing and Glen 2002), gastrointestinal absorption (Zhao et al 2001;AgatonovicKustrin et al 2001;Benigni et al 2000), activity of peptides (Brusic et al 2001), data mining, drug metabolism (Lewis 2000), and prediction of other pharmacokinetic and ADME properties. Recent reviews (e.g.…”
Section: Applications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, based on sequence information, a number of methods and algorithms have also been introduced to identify and characterize the T-cell epitopes, including binding motif scheme to matrix scoring schemes [22][23][24], decision trees [25], evolutionary algorithms [26], hidden Markov [27], CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis)/CoMSIA (comparative molecular similarity indices analysis) [28], multiple regression [29] and neutral networks [30]. As far as we know, there are few works detailing the problem of epitope prediction in a quantitative way [31][32][33]. Doytchinova and Flower [28] applied CoMFA and CoMSIA analysis to perform 3D QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationships) study on MHC/epitope binding affinity and Lin et al [29] built a linear function for predicting binding affinity of nonapeptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their Fresno method was able to rank the affinities of the peptides, and predict numerical values for their binding energies within 3-4 kJ/mol. Brusic et al used backpropagation neural networks to derive a QSAR model and identify potent HLA-A11 binders from a training set of nonamer (nine amino acid) peptides with known binding affinities [5]. Their cyclically refined models were able to identify peptides that bound but did not conform to a putative binding motif.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%