1989
DOI: 10.1109/12.30847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient CSMA/CD-based protocols for multiple priority classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, past work on incorporating fairness into distributed protocols has been limited in that these protocols attempt to provide equal share of bandwidth to different nodes (essentially, node weights are implicitly assumed to be equal). There has been work on distributed protocols that take priorities into account when performing medium access control [3,21]. However, these protocols do not perform fair allocation of bandwidth.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1: a N O D E W I T H S E V E R A L Flows S H A Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, past work on incorporating fairness into distributed protocols has been limited in that these protocols attempt to provide equal share of bandwidth to different nodes (essentially, node weights are implicitly assumed to be equal). There has been work on distributed protocols that take priorities into account when performing medium access control [3,21]. However, these protocols do not perform fair allocation of bandwidth.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1: a N O D E W I T H S E V E R A L Flows S H A Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming Poisson packet arrival and general packet length distributions mean packet delays are computed using approximate techniques. Another priority-based scheme for CSMA is presented in [34]. Some other related work for distributed systems can be found in [31] and [32].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p-persistent random access scheme is effective to avoid collision [10], [11]. In this scheme, a station senses the channel and determine to transmit or not based on the sensing decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%