Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3394171.3413938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Crowd Counting via Structured Knowledge Transfer

Abstract: Crowd counting is an application-oriented task and its inference efficiency is crucial for real-world applications. However, most previous works relied on heavy backbone networks and required prohibitive run-time consumption, which would seriously restrict their deployment scopes and cause poor scalability. To liberate these crowd counting models, we propose a novel Structured Knowledge Transfer (SKT) framework, which fully exploits the structured knowledge of a well-trained teacher network to generate a light… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed method on the proposed dataset as well as on the existing datasets, we compared the obtained results with the state-of-the-art methods while the code is available. The list of methods used in the comparison are: CSRNET [10], SPN [11], ASNet [49], MCNN [50], SANet [51], CANNet [25], SCAR [26], Mo-bileCount [23], SKT [21], and DENet [24]. The comparison is performed using quantitative and qualitative results of all methods including the results of the proposed FSCNet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed method on the proposed dataset as well as on the existing datasets, we compared the obtained results with the state-of-the-art methods while the code is available. The list of methods used in the comparison are: CSRNET [10], SPN [11], ASNet [49], MCNN [50], SANet [51], CANNet [25], SCAR [26], Mo-bileCount [23], SKT [21], and DENet [24]. The comparison is performed using quantitative and qualitative results of all methods including the results of the proposed FSCNet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these backbones can increase the computational cost, especially on large-scale datasets. In order to reduce the number of parameters and the size of a network, the authors in [21] proposed a lightweight generation network method named Structured Knowledge Transfer (SKT) using two modules: teacher module that used Intra-Layer Pattern Transfer and student exploited Inert-Layer Relation Transfer. In another research paper, the authors used MobileNetV2 backbone to reduce the FLOPs and implemented a Lightweight encoder-decoder crowd counting model [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [24,43,23], we adopt the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) as an evaluation metric. Moreover, Grid Average Mean Absolute Error (GAME [11]) is utilized to evaluate the performance in different regions.…”
Section: Implementation Details and Evaluation Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In video processing, the temporal information is encoded to boost the counting performance [34]. Recently, researchers also pay attention to the light-weight counting models [35,36]. Apart from the density map estimation, there are many other counting approaches.…”
Section: A Counting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%