ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2019.8682191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Constrained Signal Reconstruction by Randomized Epigraphical Projection

Abstract: This paper proposes a randomized optimization framework for constrained signal reconstruction, where the word "constrained" implies that data-fidelity is imposed as a hard constraint instead of adding a data-fidelity term to an objective function to be minimized. Such formulation facilitates the selection of regularization terms and hyperparameters, but due to the non-separability of the data-fidelity constraint, it does not suit block-coordinate-wise randomization as is. To resolve this, we give another expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second constraint characterizes sparse noise the zero-centered ℓ 1 ball with the radius η > 0. Using such a data-fidelity constraint instead of an additive data-fidelity term makes it easy to adjust hyperparameters since ε and η can be determined based only on noise intensity (independent of the other terms in the objective function), as addressed, for example, in [25]- [28]. The third constraint is a box constraint with µ < μ which represents the dynamic range of u.…”
Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second constraint characterizes sparse noise the zero-centered ℓ 1 ball with the radius η > 0. Using such a data-fidelity constraint instead of an additive data-fidelity term makes it easy to adjust hyperparameters since ε and η can be determined based only on noise intensity (independent of the other terms in the objective function), as addressed, for example, in [25]- [28]. The third constraint is a box constraint with µ < μ which represents the dynamic range of u.…”
Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and second constraints are spatial and temporal zero-gradient constraints on stripe noise, respectively, and the third one is a Frobenius norm ball constraint with the radius ε for datafidelity to X . The data-fidelity constraint has an important advantage over the standard additive data-fidelity in terms of facilitating hyperparameter settings, as addressed in [15,16,17,18,19]. If stripe noise is temporally variant, we remove the second constraint.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigraphical techniques have already been successfully applied to handling involved norm ball constraints, e.g., multiclass SVM [19], randomized data-fidelity constraints [20], (non-local) TV, total generalized variation (TGV), and (nonlocal) structure-tensor TV (STV) constraints [21]- [23]. In these methods, a mixed norm constraint is decoupled into 2 The proximity operator, denoted as prox γf : R N → R N , is defined for a function f ∈ Γ 0 (R N ) (Γ 0 (R N ) is the set of proper lower semicontinuous convex functions on R N [8]) and an index γ ∈ (0, ∞) by [8] prox γf (x) := argmin y∈R N γf (y) + 1 2 x − y 2 2 .…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%