2004
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2003.822702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Computation of Trellis Code Generating Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As the constraint length of the practical convolutional encoder is usually larger than 4, such as the convolutional encoder in the IS-95 forward link has a constraint length of 9 [1], it is expected that the proposed technique can further outperform the state reduction algorithm. In addition, this proposed elimination order can also be applied in the second stage of the iterative finite state machine (FSM)-based approach proposed by Shi and Wesel [8] for the efficient computation of generating functions for trellis codes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the constraint length of the practical convolutional encoder is usually larger than 4, such as the convolutional encoder in the IS-95 forward link has a constraint length of 9 [1], it is expected that the proposed technique can further outperform the state reduction algorithm. In addition, this proposed elimination order can also be applied in the second stage of the iterative finite state machine (FSM)-based approach proposed by Shi and Wesel [8] for the efficient computation of generating functions for trellis codes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the summation in (1) is over all the possible n parallel transitions and I is a dummy variable which disappears before the derived upper bound expression. Pr(u →ū|u) is the conditional probability of a transition from state u to stateū given state u, and W(i → j) denotes the Hamming weight of the information sequence for the transition from i to j, where i ∈ {u, v} and j ∈ {ū,v} [20]. Herein,…”
Section: A Error Bound Over Irregular Constellation Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above Theorem is given in Appendix A. The transfer function Ψ(j, κ, η, ǫ, ζ) can be obtained by using a product state diagram [22,23]. A product state at time j is defined as (σ j ,σ j ), where σ j is a state of the encoder of a coded CPM system andσ j represents a state of the decoder.…”
Section: Rate Adaptive Coded Cpm Using Prccmentioning
confidence: 99%