DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85902-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Clustering of Structured Documents Using Graph Self-Organizing Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first experiment was visually evaluated and the second was evaluated using the metric CQ defined by (10). Also the results of the second experiment were compared with GraphClust method [12] (described in section I) using the option for sparse graphs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first experiment was visually evaluated and the second was evaluated using the metric CQ defined by (10). Also the results of the second experiment were compared with GraphClust method [12] (described in section I) using the option for sparse graphs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some groups in SOM are empty and most of the groups generated by GraphClust have only one element. Quality of clustering was evaluated using (10). When comparing SOM clustering with expert clustering .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More precisely, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, the chosen competitors are XCFS [19], CRP as well as 4RP [28], SOM [17] and LSK [25]. On Sigmod, the comparison is performed against XCFS [19].…”
Section: B Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%