2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.769401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient classifier generation and weighted voting for atlas-based segmentation: two small steps faster and closer to the combination oracle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, local miss-matches degrade the quality of the outcome. Similar observations were reported elsewhere in the context of prostate and brain segmentation ( Artaechevarria et al, 2009( Artaechevarria et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Nmisupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, local miss-matches degrade the quality of the outcome. Similar observations were reported elsewhere in the context of prostate and brain segmentation ( Artaechevarria et al, 2009( Artaechevarria et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Nmisupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The first step toward weighted atlasbased segmentation consists in developing a similarity criterion between the target image and aligned atlas images. Normalized mutual information (NMI), normalized cross correlation (NCC) and mean square distance (MSD) are the most common similarity measures used for implementation of weighted atlas-based segmentation ( Yushkevich et al, 2010 ;Artaechevarria et al, 2008 ). These similarity measures are briefly described below.…”
Section: Global Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations